Arris Tg1682g FirmwareOperating system · Commscope

CVE-2018-10990

HIGH · 8.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2018-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
86/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
On Arris Touchstone Telephony Gateway TG1682G 9.1.103J6 devices, a logout action does not immediately destroy all state on the device related to the validity of the "credential" cookie, which might make it easier for attackers to obtain access at a later time (e.g., "at least for a few minutes"). NOTE: there is no documentation stating that the web UI's logout feature was supposed to do anything beyond removing the cookie from one instance of a web browser; a client-side logout action is often not intended to address cases where a person has made a copy of a cookie outside of a browser.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Arris TG1682G Telephony Gateway device has insufficient session invalidation where the logout action only removes the credential cookie from the browser but does not invalidate the server-side session state. This allows a captured cookie to remain valid for several minutes after legitimate logout, enabling session reuse attacks.

MitigationImplement server-side session invalidation on logout by removing or marking the session identifier as invalid in the backend session store immediately upon logout request.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Arris Tg1682g FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 9.1.103j6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the device administration interface or check the device label to confirm the model is Arris TG1682G
    Affected if The device is not an Arris TG1682G Telephony Gateway, then it is not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Check the firmware version
    Navigate to the device web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1) and look in the status or firmware upgrade section for the firmware version, or use the command line interface and run 'show version' or similar command
    Affected if The firmware version is 9.1.103j6 - this is the only affected version listed for this CVE
  3. Inspect session management configuration
    If you have administrative access to the device, examine the session management or security settings for any configuration related to session timeout or session invalidation. Look for a setting that controls whether server-side sessions are invalidated on logout
    Affected if No server-side session invalidation is configured or available as an option on logout - the device only removes the cookie client-side without invalidating the server session
  4. Test session reuse after logout
    Log into the device web interface, capture the session cookie, then log out. Attempt to use the captured session cookie to access the device after logout. If access is still granted, the vulnerability is present
    Affected if The session cookie remains valid and grants access after logout, indicating the server-side session was not invalidated

A user is affected if they are using an Arris TG1682G device with firmware version 9.1.103j6 and the device allows session reuse after logout.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement server-side session invalidation on logout by removing or marking the session identifier as invalid in the backend session store immediately upon logout request.

Fix this in Arris Tg1682g Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
52.0 hours of engineering $9,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10990 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10990 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data