CVE-2018-11277
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Snapdragon (Automobile, Mobile, Wear) in version MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 430, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845, SDA660, the com.qualcomm.embms is a vendor package deployed in the system image which has an inadequate permission level and allows any application installed from Play Store to request this permission at install-time. The system application interfaces with the Radio Interface Layer leading to potential access control issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe com.qualcomm.embms system application exposes a protected permission at an inadequate protection level, allowing any third-party application installed from the Play Store to request this permission at install-time. This grants the requesting application potential access to the Radio Interface Layer (RIL) through the eMBMS component, creating an access control bypass.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset and firmware versionCheck the device build information or use 'getprop ro.board.platform' and 'getprop ro.build.description' to identify the Qualcomm chipset (e.g., msm8909w, msm8996au, sd210, sd212, sd205, sd430, sd450, sd615) and firmware versionAffected if The chipset matches any of the affected models (Msm8909w, Msm8996au, Sd210, Sd212, Sd205, Sd430, Sd450, Sd615) - all versions of these are affected
-
Verify com.qualcomm.embms system application is presentCheck if the package com.qualcomm.embms exists on the device using 'pm list packages | grep embms' or 'dumpsys package com.qualcomm.embms'Affected if The com.qualcomm.embms package is installed on the device - the vulnerability exists in this application
-
Inspect the permission protection level for the exposed permissionDecompile the com.qualcomm.embms APK (from /system/app/embms or /system/priv-app) and examine the AndroidManifest.xml for the permission definition; check the 'android:protectionLevel' attributeAffected if The protectionLevel is set to 'normal' or 'dangerous' instead of 'signature' or 'signatureOrSystem' - this allows any third-party app to request the permission at install-time
-
Check if third-party applications hold the exposed permissionUse 'dumpsys package <package_name>' for installed apps and look for the specific permission granted by com.qualcomm.embms, or use 'pm list permissions -d' to list dangerous permissionsAffected if Any third-party application (non-system, non-signed by the same certificate as embms) is granted the permission - this confirms active exploitation or vulnerable state
The environment is affected if the device uses any of the listed Qualcomm firmware versions AND contains the com.qualcomm.embms application with a permission protection level that allows third-party apps to obtain it at install time.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis vulnerability requires a vendor firmware update from Qualcomm and/or device OEMs to change the permission protection level from installable to signature-level or system-level. Users should apply OEM security patches promptly.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,672.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11277 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data