CVE-2018-11338
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIntuit Lacerte 2017 for Windows in a client/server environment transfers the entire customer list in cleartext over SMB, which allows attackers to (1) obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network or (2) conduct man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks via unspecified vectors. The customer list contains each customer's full name, social security number (SSN), address, job title, phone number, Email address, spouse's phone/Email address, and other sensitive information. After the client software authenticates to the server database, the server sends the customer list. There is no need for further exploitation as all sensitive data is exposed. This vulnerability was validated on Intuit Lacerte 2017, however older versions of Lacerte may be vulnerable.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIntuit Lacerte 2017 transmits the complete customer database in cleartext over SMB after client authentication, exposing all PII (names, SSNs, addresses, phone numbers, emails) to network sniffing and MITM attacks. No encryption protects sensitive tax client data in transit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2017CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Intuit Lacerte installationCheck for Intuit Lacerte in the list of installed programs via Control Panel > Programs and Features, or check the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Intuit\Lacerte) for the executable file.Affected if Intuit Lacerte is installed and the version number shown is 2017 or earlier.
-
Confirm Lacerte version numberRight-click on the Lacerte executable (usually LX.exe or similar) in the installation folder, select Properties, and check the Version tab. Alternatively, launch Lacerte and check Help > About Lacerte for the version display.Affected if The displayed version is 2017 or any year prior to 2017.
-
Identify Lacerte data directory and SMB sharingLocate the Lacerte data folder (commonly in C:\ProgramData\Intuit\Lacerte\Data or within the application directory). Check if this folder is shared via SMB by opening Computer Management > Shared Folders > Shares, or by running 'net share' in Command Prompt.Affected if The Lacerte data directory is shared via SMB (visible in shared folders list) and accessible over the network.
-
Monitor SMB traffic during Lacerte operationUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark) to capture network traffic on ports 445 (SMB over TCP) and 139 (NetBIOS) while accessing client data in Lacerte. Look for unencrypted data transmissions containing client names, SSNs, or other PII in plaintext.Affected if Cleartext data containing client PII (names, addresses, SSNs) is visible in SMB packets traveling over the network.
-
Check SMB signing and encryption settingsOn the Lacerte server/workstation, run 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration' in PowerShell (Windows Server 2012+ / Windows 8+) to check if RequireSecuritySignature and EncryptData are enabled. Also check Group Policy settings under Computer Configuration > Windows Settings > Security Options > Microsoft Network Client: Digitally sign communications.Affected if SMB encryption (EncryptData) is disabled and SMB signing is not required, allowing unencrypted database transmission.
The environment is affected if Intuit Lacerte version 2017 or earlier is installed and its client database folder is shared over SMB without encryption enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact Intuit for available patches; if unavailable, implement network-level protections such as SMB encryption, VPN tunnels, or network segmentation to protect the cleartext transmission of sensitive data.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11338 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11338 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data