CVE-2018-1168
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations of ABB MicroSCADA 9.3 with FP 1-2-3. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the access controls for the installed product files. The installation procedure leaves critical files open to manipulation by any authenticated user. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-5097.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceABB MicroSCADA 9.3 installation leaves critical files with overly permissive access controls, allowing any authenticated user to modify them. An attacker with low-privileged access can manipulate these files to execute code at SYSTEM privilege level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 9.1= 9.1.5= 9.2= 9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Sys600 firmware versionCheck the product version through the system's about dialog, release notes, or version file in the installation directory. Common paths include C:\Program Files\ABB\MicroSCADA or C:\Program Files\Hitachi Energy\Sys600.Affected if The installed version matches 9.0, 9.1, 9.1.5, 9.2, or 9.4
-
Locate the product installation directoryIdentify the root installation folder for ABB MicroSCADA or Hitachi Energy Sys600 on the system.Affected if The product is installed and the installation directory exists
-
Examine file permissions on critical executable filesUse icacls or PowerShell Get-Acl to inspect permissions on .exe, .dll, and .cfg files in the product directory. Look for entries granting write or modify access to Users, Authenticated Users, or Everyone groups.Affected if Non-administrator users have Write or Modify permissions on executable or configuration files in the product directory
-
Check for world-writable scripts or configuration filesSearch for .bat, .cmd, .ps1, .xml, or .ini files in the installation directory and verify their access controls. Run: icacls "<install_dir>\*" /findstr "(W:M|W:D)" to find writable entries.Affected if Any script or configuration file is writable by standard authenticated users
-
Verify if low-privilege users can modify startup or scheduled task filesCheck permissions on files referenced by scheduled tasks, startup folders, or service configurations associated with the product.Affected if Service configuration or startup files are modifiable by non-admin users
You are affected if the installed Sys600 firmware version is 9.0, 9.1, 9.1.5, 9.2, or 9.4 AND any critical product files are writable by authenticated non-administrator users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply restricted file permissions to critical product files, restricting write access to administrators only. Verify the installation was performed with secure defaults or run a post-installation hardening script.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1168 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data