CVE-2018-11783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsslheaders plugin extracts information from the client certificate and sets headers in the request based on the configuration of the plugin. The plugin doesn't strip the headers from the request in some scenarios. This problem was discovered in versions 6.0.0 to 6.0.3, 7.0.0 to 7.1.5, and 8.0.0 to 8.0.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe sslheaders plugin extracts client certificate information and sets headers in HTTP requests based on plugin configuration. In affected versions (6.0.0-6.0.3, 7.0.0-7.1.5, 8.0.0-8.0.1), the plugin fails to strip these sensitive certificate-derived headers in certain scenarios, potentially exposing confidential TLS client certificate data to backend servers or intermediate components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.3>= 7.0.0, <= 7.1.5>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Traffic Server versionRun 'traffic_server -V' or check the installed package version via package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q trafficserver' or 'dpkg -l trafficserver')Affected if The version number falls within 6.0.0-6.0.3, 7.0.0-7.1.5, or 8.0.0-8.0.1
-
Verify sslheaders plugin is loadedCheck plugin configuration in 'plugin.config' or 'records.config' for sslheaders entries, or list loaded plugins via 'traffic_server -K'Affected if The sslheaders plugin is loaded and active
-
Inspect sslheaders plugin configurationExamine the sslheaders configuration file (commonly in /etc/trafficserver/ or specified in plugin.config) for directives that extract client certificate fields such as 'ssl-client-cert', 'ssl-client-subject', or similar certificate-derived header definitionsAffected if The configuration contains directives that set certificate-derived headers (e.g., 'X-SSL-Client-Cert', 'X-Client-Cert', etc.) without corresponding stripping rules
-
Check for header stripping configurationReview sslheaders config for any 'remove' or 'strip' directives applied to the certificate-derived headers in the request pathAffected if There are no remove/strip directives for the certificate-derived headers, or the stripping is only applied in limited scenarios rather than all request paths
You are affected if your Apache Traffic Server version is vulnerable (6.0.0-6.0.3, 7.0.0-7.1.5, or 8.0.0-8.0.1) AND the sslheaders plugin is enabled with client certificate header extraction configured but without proper header stripping in all request paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade sslheaders to version 6.0.4, 7.1.6, 8.0.2 or later to receive the patch, and audit configurations to ensure certificate-derived headers are properly stripped in all request paths.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data