CVE-2018-11788
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Karaf provides a features deployer, which allows users to "hot deploy" a features XML by dropping the file directly in the deploy folder. The features XML is parsed by XMLInputFactory class. Apache Karaf XMLInputFactory class doesn't contain any mitigation codes against XXE. This is a potential security risk as an user can inject external XML entities in Apache Karaf version prior to 4.1.7 or 4.2.2. It has been fixed in Apache Karaf 4.1.7 and 4.2.2 releases.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Karaf's features deployer is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) injection. The XMLInputFactory class used to parse features XML files dropped in the deploy folder lacks XXE mitigation, allowing attackers to inject malicious external XML entities by placing crafted XML files in the deploy directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.7>= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.1= 4.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Karaf versionRun 'karaf --version' or check the 'etc/org.apache.karaf.version.properties' file, or inspect the Karaf JAR manifestAffected if The installed version is less than 4.1.7, or is 4.2.0, or is 4.2.1
-
Verify features deployer is enabledCheck for the presence of the 'features-deployer' feature or the 'org.apache.karaf.deployer.features.cfg' configuration file in the 'etc' directoryAffected if The features deployer feature is installed or the deployer configuration exists in the environment
-
Confirm deploy folder is accessibleLocate the deploy folder (typically 'deploy/' in the Karaf root directory) and verify it exists and has appropriate file permissionsAffected if The deploy directory exists and is accessible for placing XML files
-
Inspect XML parsing configurationExamine the features deployer JAR or source code for XMLInputFactory usage; look for whether XXE protection (such as disabling external entities) is configured in XML parsing codeAffected if The XMLInputFactory used for parsing features XML lacks XXE mitigation settings such as XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD or XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA
You are affected if Apache Karaf versions 4.2.0, 4.2.1, or any version below 4.1.7 are running with the features deployer enabled and the deploy folder is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.7
Upgrade to Apache Karaf 4.1.7, 4.2.2, or later versions which contain XXE protection in the XMLInputFactory. Alternatively, restrict file access to the deploy folder and disable the features deployer if upgrading is not feasible.
Apache Karaf 4.1.7 or 4.2.2 (depending on current version branch)
- 1. Identify the current Apache Karaf version in use (check Karaf version file or startup logs)
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on: if version < 4.1.7, plan upgrade to 4.1.7; if version >= 4.2.0 and <= 4.2.1, plan upgrade to 4.2.2
- 3. Review the Apache Karaf 4.1.7 and 4.2.2 release notes for any changes relevant to your deployment
- 4. Create a backup of current Karaf installation and configuration
- 5. Download Apache Karaf 4.1.7 (for pre-4.1.7 installs) or 4.2.2 (for 4.2.x installs) from the official Apache Karaf distribution
- 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify application compatibility
- 7. Deploy the upgraded version to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11788 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11788 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data