OozieApplication · Apache

CVE-2018-11799

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-12-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Vulnerability allows a user of Apache Oozie 3.1.3-incubating to 5.0.0 to impersonate other users. The malicious user can construct an XML that results workflows running in other user's name.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Oozie versions 3.1.3-incubating through 5.0.0 contains an XML parsing vulnerability that allows authenticated users to impersonate other users by crafting malicious XML configurations. The flaw permits unauthorized workflow execution under different user identities, representing a privilege escalation issue.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Oozie to version 5.1.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, implement strict XML input validation and review user access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OozieApplication
Affected:>= 3.1.3, < 5.1.0= 3.1.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Apache Oozie version
    Run 'oozie version' or check the Oozie WAR file version in /usr/lib/oozie/oozie.war, or query the Oozie REST API at /oozie/v2/admin/status
    Affected if The installed version is 3.1.3, or any version from 3.1.3-incubating through 5.0.0 (versions < 5.1.0)
  2. Verify Oozie is accepting workflow job submissions
    Check if the Oozie server is running and the /oozie/v2/jobs endpoint is accessible via REST API using curl or similar tool
    Affected if Oozie is running and accepting job submissions via the web services API
  3. Confirm XML workflow definition parsing is enabled
    Look for workflow.xml files being submitted to Oozie. Check the Oozie configuration file (oozie-site.xml) for 'oozie.service.WorkflowJobServlet' and 'oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService' settings, or examine submitted jobs via 'oozie jobs -jobtype wf'
    Affected if XML-based workflow definitions are being parsed and executed by Oozie
  4. Identify if multi-user impersonation is configured
    Examine Oozie configuration files (oozie-site.xml) for 'oozie.service.HadoopAccessorService.impersonation.enabled' and review proxyuser settings for Hadoop
    Affected if Hadoop impersonation/proxyuser is enabled, allowing Oozie to submit jobs on behalf of other users
  5. Review Oozie audit logs for unauthorized user impersonation
    Check Oozie audit logs (typically in /var/log/oozie/) for entries where the 'user' submitting the job differs from the 'effective user' or 'group' fields, indicating potential exploitation attempts
    Affected if Audit logs show job submissions where the authenticated user differs from the job owner identity

A system is affected if Oozie version is less than 5.1.0 AND the system accepts XML-based workflow submissions with Hadoop impersonation enabled, allowing an authenticated user to execute workflows under different user identities.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.1.0 or later
Fixed in 5.1.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Oozie to version 5.1.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, implement strict XML input validation and review user access controls.

Fix this in Oozie Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11799 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data