CVE-2018-11845
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUsage of non-time-constant comparison functions can lead to information leakage through side channel analysis in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in versions MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8996AU, QCS605, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability involves the use of non-time-constant comparison functions in affected Snapdragon processors. These functions create timing side channels where the execution time varies based on the data being compared, potentially allowing attackers to infer sensitive information like cryptographic keys or passwords through precise timing measurements.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device hardware specifications, system information, or boot logs for the Snapdragon or MDM processor model number (e.g., Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Qcs605, Sd 210)Affected if The chipset matches any of the affected models: Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Qcs605, or Sd 210
-
Determine the firmware versionCheck the firmware version of the Qualcomm chipset via device diagnostics, AT commands, or firmware metadata. For embedded devices, this may require accessing the bootloader or firmware imageAffected if The firmware version cannot be determined or exists on any version of the affected chipsets (all versions are listed as affected)
-
Audit code for non-constant-time comparison usageReview application and system code for use of standard comparison functions like strcmp, memcmp, orbcmp on sensitive data such as cryptographic keys, passwords, tokens, or HMAC values. Search for these function calls in the codebaseAffected if The system code uses strcmp, memcmp, or similar functions to compare cryptographic secrets, passwords, or other timing-sensitive data without using timing-safe alternatives like timing_independent_compare or OpenSSL's CRYPTO_memcmp
-
Verify cryptographic implementationsInspect cryptographic libraries and implementations on the device to determine if they use constant-time comparison functions for secret validation. Check whether password verification, key validation, or HMAC verification employs timing-safe comparisonsAffected if Password verification, key comparison, or HMAC validation relies on timing-vulnerable comparison functions rather than constant-time alternatives
A system is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Qcs605, Sd 210) and performs sensitive comparisons (passwords, cryptographic keys, tokens) using standard non-constant-time functions like strcmp or memcmp.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply firmware updates provided by the device/OEM manufacturer. Where patches are unavailable, implement cryptographic operations using constant-time comparison functions and avoid timing-sensitive comparisons on sensitive data.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11845 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11845 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data