CVE-2018-11855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIf an end user makes use of SCP11 sample OCE code without modification it could lead to a buffer overflow when transmitting a CAPDU in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT and Snapdragon Mobile in versions MDM9607, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8996AU, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 636, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM630, SDM660.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the SCP11 sample OCE (Open Card Environment) code when transmitting CAPDUs (Command Application Data Units). The vulnerability stems from insufficient bounds checking during CAPDU transmission, allowing memory corruption that could enable code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset in the deviceCheck the device hardware specifications, boot logs, or system information to determine the exact Qualcomm processor model (e.g., Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, or Sd 410)Affected if The device contains any of the following chips: Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, or Sd 410
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the device firmware information through manufacturer documentation, boot logs, or firmware extraction tools. Compare the firmware version against the affected product listAffected if The device firmware corresponds to any of the listed Qualcomm chips (all versions are affected)
-
Determine if SCP11 OCE code is presentInspect the firmware image or source code for the presence of SCP11 (Secure Channel Protocol 11) and OCE (Open Card Environment) implementation files or modulesAffected if The firmware contains SCP11 sample OCE code used for smart card communication
-
Identify CAPDU transmission functionalitySearch the codebase for CAPDU (Command Application Data Unit) handling functions, particularly those involved in transmitting data between the device and smart cardAffected if The device implements CAPDU transmission routines as part of smart card communication
-
Inspect bounds checking in CAPDU handlingReview the CAPDU transmission code for buffer size validation and boundary checks before memory operations. Look for unsafe functions like memcpy, strcpy, or manual pointer arithmetic without prior size validationAffected if The CAPDU transmission code lacks proper buffer size validation or contains unchecked buffer operations
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, or Sd 410) and runs firmware containing the SCP11 sample OCE code with CAPDU transmission that lacks proper bounds checking.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf using the affected SCP11 sample OCE code, implement proper buffer size validation and bounds checking before transmitting CAPDUs; otherwise, obtain and deploy firmware updates from the device manufacturer once available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,496.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data