CVE-2018-12334
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedProtection Mechanism Failure in ECOS Secure Boot Stick (aka SBS) 5.6.5 allows an attacker to compromise authentication and encryption keys via a virtualization attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe ECOS Secure Boot Stick 5.6.5 suffers from a protection mechanism failure that allows virtualization-based attacks to bypass security controls and extract authentication and encryption keys. This vulnerability affects a hardware security device designed to provide secure boot functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ECOS Secure Boot Stick in the environmentEnumerate USB devices connected to systems using commands such as 'lsusb' on Linux, 'system_profiler SPUSBDataType' on macOS, or check Windows Device Manager for a device named 'ECOS Secure Boot Stick'Affected if The ECOS Secure Boot Stick device is present and enumerated in the system's USB device list
-
Check firmware version of the ECOS Secure Boot StickUse the device's management software, firmware update utility, or consult the device's administrative interface to query the installed firmware versionAffected if The reported firmware version is exactly 5.6.5
-
Determine if virtualization features are accessibleReview system configuration for hypervisor presence (Hyper-V, VMware, VirtualBox, QEMU) and check whether the ECOS device is exposed to or passthrough-configured for virtual machinesAffected if Virtualization software is running and the ECOS device could be captured or virtualized by an attacker
-
Audit for signs of key extraction or unauthorized accessReview authentication logs, key management audit trails, or security event logs for anomalous access patterns, failed authentication attempts, or unexpected key export events related to the secure boot stickAffected if There is evidence of unauthorized key access, authentication anomalies, or unexpected key extraction operations
The environment is affected if an ECOS Secure Boot Stick with firmware version 5.6.5 is present and could be subjected to virtualization-based attacks that bypass its security controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact ECOS for firmware updates addressing the virtualization attack vector; if no patch is available, implement additional physical and logical controls to prevent unauthorized virtualization of the secure boot stick.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-12334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-12334 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data