CVE-2018-1237
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell EMC ScaleIO versions prior to 2.5, contain improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts on the Light installation Agent (LIA). This component is deployed on every server in the ScaleIO cluster and is used for central management of ScaleIO nodes. A remote malicious user, having network access to LIA, could potentially exploit this vulnerability to launch brute force guessing of user names and passwords of user accounts on the LIA.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell EMC ScaleIO Light Installation Agent (LIA) lacks proper account lockout or rate limiting mechanisms, allowing remote attackers unlimited authentication attempts to brute force user credentials. The LIA runs on every node in the ScaleIO cluster and provides central management functionality, making this a critical exposure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ScaleIO installation exists in your environmentCheck if Dell EMC ScaleIO software is deployed in your infrastructure. Look for ScaleIO-related processes, services, or documentation.Affected if ScaleIO software is present in your environment and the version is below 2.5
-
Identify ScaleIO versionRun the ScaleIO command to retrieve the installed version. Common methods include checking the ScaleIO management interface, running 'scli --query_all' or using the ScaleIO GUI to view system information.Affected if The installed ScaleIO version is less than 2.5 (for example, 2.0.x, 2.1.x, 2.3.x, etc.)
-
Verify Light Installation Agent (LIA) is runningCheck if the LIA service or process is active on ScaleIO cluster nodes. The LIA typically runs as a service on each node for central management functionality.Affected if LIA is running on any node in the ScaleIO cluster and the ScaleIO version is below 2.5
-
Check network exposure of LIAIdentify network accessibility of the LIA service. Determine if the LIA ports are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, or if they are restricted to internal/trusted network segments.Affected if LIA is accessible from networks outside your trusted boundary and the version is below 2.5
-
Verify account lockout or rate limiting configurationInspect the LIA authentication configuration settings. Check if account lockout policies or rate limiting mechanisms are enabled for LIA authentication attempts.Affected if No account lockout policy or rate limiting is configured for LIA authentication, and the ScaleIO version is below 2.5
Your environment is affected if Dell EMC ScaleIO with version below 2.5 is installed, the LIA service is running, and the authentication lacks account lockout or rate limiting protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.5
Upgrade ScaleIO to version 2.5 or later which addresses the authentication restriction flaw, or implement network-level access controls to limit LIA exposure to trusted networks only.
ScaleIO version 2.5 or later
- 1. Review the current ScaleIO cluster deployment and document all nodes running the LIA component.
- 2. Plan a maintenance window for the upgrade, ensuring proper backups and cluster state snapshots are available.
- 3. Upgrade the ScaleIO cluster to version 2.5 or later, following Dell EMC's standard upgrade procedures.
- 4. Verify that all LIA components across all nodes have been successfully updated to the fixed version.
- 5. Confirm the authentication restriction is now properly enforced on the LIA service.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1237 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1237 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data