Vipr ControllerApplication · Emc

CVE-2018-1240

HIGH · 8.0 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.6.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Dell EMC ViPR Controller, versions after 3.0.0.38, contain an information exposure vulnerability in the VRRP. VRRP defaults to an insecure configuration in Linux's keepalived component which sends the cluster password in plaintext through multicast. A malicious user, having access to the vCloud subnet where ViPR is deployed, could potentially sniff the password and use it to take over the cluster's virtual IP and cause a denial of service on that ViPR Controller system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Dell EMC ViPR Controller versions after 3.0.0.38 use keepalived for VRRP functionality with an insecure default configuration that transmits the cluster password in plaintext via multicast. An attacker with access to the vCloud subnet can sniff this plaintext password and use it to hijack the virtual IP or cause denial of service.

MitigationEnable VRRP authentication or encryption in keepalived configuration, and implement network segmentation to restrict access to the vCloud subnet where ViPR is deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vipr ControllerApplication
Affected:>= 3.0.0.39, < 3.6.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ViPR Controller version
    Run 'vipr-version' or check /opt/vipr/version file to determine the installed version of Dell EMC ViPR Controller
    Affected if The installed version is greater than or equal to 3.0.0.39 AND less than 3.6.1.4
  2. Locate keepalived configuration
    Find the keepalived.conf file in /etc/keepalived/ or search for keepalived configuration files used by ViPR Controller for VRRP functionality
    Affected if A keepalived.conf file exists and is configured for ViPR VRRP clusters
  3. Verify VRRP authentication configuration
    Open the keepalived.conf file and inspect the vrrp_authentication or authentication block within the vrrp_instance section. Check if 'auth_type' is set to a value other than NONE or plaintext
    Affected if No authentication is configured (auth_type is NONE or missing) or the password is transmitted in plaintext
  4. Check VRRP encryption settings
    Inspect the vrrp_instance configuration for any 'encrypt' or 'virtual_router' settings. Verify if AH (Authentication Header) or ESP encryption is enabled for VRRP packets
    Affected if No encryption is configured for VRRP packet transmission
  5. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the ViPR Controller network interface used for VRRP (multicast) is accessible from untrusted networks. Review vCloud subnet access controls and VLAN configuration
    Affected if The VRRP multicast traffic is reachable from an untrusted or shared vCloud network segment

You are affected if ViPR Controller version is between 3.0.0.39 and 3.6.1.4 inclusive, and keepalived is configured for VRRP without authentication or encryption enabled on an accessible network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.6.1.4 or later
Fixed in 3.6.1.4
Interim mitigation

Enable VRRP authentication or encryption in keepalived configuration, and implement network segmentation to restrict access to the vCloud subnet where ViPR is deployed.

Fix this in Vipr Controller Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1240 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1240 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data