CVE-2018-12475
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere vulnerability in obs-service-download_files of openSUSE Open Build Service allows authenticated users to generate HTTP request against internal networks and potentially downloading data that is exposed there. This issue affects: openSUSE Open Build Service .
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe obs-service-download_files component in Open Build Service lacks proper validation of user-supplied URLs, allowing authenticated users to induce the service to make HTTP requests to internal network resources (SSRF). This enables attackers to access data from internal services, intranet resources, or cloud metadata endpoints that should not be externally accessible.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify download_files service is installedCheck for the obs-service-download_files package or service binary on the OBS server (typically found in /usr/lib/obs/service/ or via package manager)Affected if The download_files service binary exists on the system
-
Confirm OBS accepts authenticated usersReview OBS authentication configuration to determine if user accounts can be created and login is permitted (default OBS configuration allows authenticated users)Affected if The OBS instance has user authentication enabled and accepts logins from non-admin users
-
Check download_files service configurationInspect the service configuration files for download_files (typically in /etc/obs/services/ or project service definitions) to see if URL validation or allowlisting is configuredAffected if No URL allowlist or domain restriction is defined in the service configuration
-
Verify network isolationReview firewall rules or network policies restricting outbound access from the OBS server to internal ranges (192.168.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12) and cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254)Affected if No network segmentation or firewall rules block access to internal network ranges from the OBS server
-
Inspect recent service executionsReview OBS service logs for download_files invocations, looking for requests to internal IP ranges or non-public domainsAffected if Logs show download_files service has been used to access internal network addresses or private IP ranges
A user is affected if the download_files service is installed and the OBS instance allows authenticated user access without URL allowlisting and without network isolation blocking internal resource access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict URL allowlist validation in download_files service to restrict downloads to trusted external domains only; additionally, enforce network segmentation to block the build service from accessing internal network ranges (RFC 1918 addresses, cloud metadata endpoints).
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-12475 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-12475 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data