OpenmeetingsApplication · Apache

CVE-2018-1286

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-02-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0 - 4.0.1, CRUD operations on privileged users are not password protected allowing an authenticated attacker to deny service for privileged users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Apache OpenMeetings 3.0.0-4.0.1, authenticated attackers can perform Create, Read, Update, and Delete operations on privileged user accounts without password verification, allowing them to deny service by modifying or deleting admin/privileged user accounts.

MitigationUpgrade to Apache OpenMeetings version 4.0.2 or later which implements password protection for CRUD operations on privileged users. If upgrade is not immediately feasible, restrict administrative API endpoints to only the highest-privilege administrators.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenmeetingsApplication
Affected:>= 3.0.0, <= 4.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenMeetings installation location
    Locate the OpenMeetings installation directory or running service. Common paths include /opt/openmeetings, /usr/share/openmeetings, or check running Java processes for openmeetings. Look for the file 'openmeetings.properties' or 'om.ini' in the installation directory.
    Affected if OpenMeetings is installed on the system.
  2. Determine installed OpenMeetings version
    Check the version file or application metadata. In the installation directory, look for a VERSION file, or check the build manifest, or access the login page which often displays the version in the footer. The version is also visible in the admin dashboard under 'Configuration' or 'System Info'.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 3.0.0 through 4.0.1 inclusive.
  3. Verify existence of privileged user accounts
    Log into the OpenMeetings administration panel and navigate to 'Users' or 'Administration > Users'. Look for accounts with elevated privileges such as 'admin', 'moderator', or accounts with 'root' or 'administrator' roles assigned.
    Affected if Privileged or admin user accounts exist in the system.
  4. Check API endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the user management API endpoints without elevated privileges. The vulnerable endpoints typically include REST API paths under /openmeetings/services/user/ or /openmeetings/api/users. Use a low-privilege user account to test if CRUD operations on privileged users are permitted without password verification.
    Affected if Non-privileged authenticated users can modify, delete, or perform operations on admin/privileged user accounts without providing a password.

You are affected if OpenMeetings version 3.0.0 through 4.0.1 is installed, privileged user accounts exist, and the admin API is accessible to non-privileged authenticated users without password verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.0.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Apache OpenMeetings version 4.0.2 or later which implements password protection for CRUD operations on privileged users. If upgrade is not immediately feasible, restrict administrative API endpoints to only the highest-privilege administrators.

Fix this in Openmeetings Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,820
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1286 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data