Commons EmailApplication · Apache

CVE-2018-1294

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-03-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
If a user of Apache Commons Email (typically an application programmer) passes unvalidated input as the so-called "Bounce Address", and that input contains line-breaks, then the email details (recipients, contents, etc.) might be manipulated. Mitigation: Users should upgrade to Commons-Email 1.5. You can mitigate this vulnerability for older versions of Commons Email by stripping line-breaks from data, that will be passed to Email.setBounceAddress(String).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Commons Email contains an email header injection vulnerability where unvalidated input containing line-breaks passed to the setBounceAddress() method allows manipulation of email headers, potentially affecting recipients and email contents.

MitigationUpgrade to Apache Commons Email 1.5 which includes input validation, or implement server-side input validation to strip line-break characters from any data passed to Email.setBounceAddress().

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Commons EmailApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, <= 1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Commons Email dependency
    Examine project build files (pom.xml, build.gradle, build.xml) or the lib/ directory for commons-email JAR files. Search dependency management configs for 'commons-email' or 'apache.commons.email'.
    Affected if The dependency exists and no version override is specified that would pull a fixed version.
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the commons-email JAR file and read its filename (e.g., commons-email-1.4.jar) or inspect the MANIFEST.MF file inside the JAR for the Implementation-Version. In Maven projects, run 'mvn dependency:tree' or 'mvn dependency:list' to resolve the actual version being used.
    Affected if The resolved version is 1.0 through 1.4 inclusive.
  3. Find setBounceAddress() usage
    Search source code for calls to setBounceAddress method (case-insensitive search for 'setBounceAddress' or '.setBounceAddress('). Review all call sites to identify what input is passed to this method.
    Affected if The method is called with any input that originates from external sources, configuration files, or user-modifiable data.
  4. Check for input validation on bounce address
    At each setBounceAddress() call site, trace the input value back to its source. Examine the code between the input source and the setBounceAddress call for validation logic that strips or rejects line-break characters (\r, \n, CR, LF).
    Affected if No validation exists that explicitly removes or blocks line-break characters before passing data to setBounceAddress.

The environment is affected if Apache Commons Email version 1.4 or earlier is in use AND the setBounceAddress() method is called with external input that has not been validated to exclude line-break characters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Apache Commons Email 1.5 which includes input validation, or implement server-side input validation to strip line-break characters from any data passed to Email.setBounceAddress().

Fix this in Commons Email Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1294 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data