OpentsdbApplication

CVE-2018-13003

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-06-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in OpenTSDB 2.3.0. There is XSS in parameter 'type' to the /suggest URI.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenTSDB 2.3.0 contains a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /suggest URI endpoint. The 'type' parameter is not properly sanitized or encoded before being reflected back in the HTTP response, allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the context of the victim's browser.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'type' parameter in the /suggest endpoint. Alternatively, upgrade to a patched version of OpenTSDB if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpentsdbApplication
Affected:= 2.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm OpenTSDB installation and version
    Locate the OpenTSDB installation directory and check for version information. Common locations include: a version file in the installation root, the GUI footer, or running 'tsdb version' if the CLI is available. Also check any package manager records if installed via yum/apt.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.3.0
  2. Verify HTTP service is running
    Check if the OpenTSDB HTTP service is active and listening on its port (default 4242). Use commands like 'netstat -tlnp | grep 4242' or 'curl http://localhost:4242' to confirm the service is accessible.
    Affected if The HTTP service is running and accessible (required for the XSS to be exploitable)
  3. Identify if /suggest endpoint is exposed
    Send a request to the /suggest endpoint, for example: curl 'http://<host>:4242/suggest?type=metrics'. Check if the endpoint returns a response.
    Affected if The /suggest endpoint is accessible and responds to requests
  4. Test for parameter reflection in response
    Send a request with a test value in the 'type' parameter, such as: curl 'http://<host>:4242/suggest?type=testvalue'. Examine the HTTP response body to see if the 'type' parameter value is reflected back without encoding.
    Affected if The 'type' parameter value appears in the response body without HTML encoding (e.g., visible as plain text rather than being escaped)
  5. Compare against affected version range
    Verify that your OpenTSDB version is 2.3.0. Check version files, the web interface, or query the API if a version endpoint exists.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.3.0

You are affected if OpenTSDB version 2.3.0 is installed, the HTTP service is running, and the /suggest endpoint reflects the 'type' parameter back to the user without proper encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'type' parameter in the /suggest endpoint. Alternatively, upgrade to a patched version of OpenTSDB if available.

Fix this in Opentsdb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13003 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data