Enterprise SuiteApplication · Safensoft

CVE-2018-13014

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-06-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.4.2 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Storing password in recoverable format in safensec.com (SysWatch service) in SAFE'N'SEC SoftControl/SafenSoft SysWatch, SoftControl/SafenSoft TPSecure, and SoftControl/SafenSoft Enterprise Suite before 4.4.2 allows the local attacker to restore the SysWatch password from the settings database and modify program settings.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SysWatch service stores administrative passwords in a recoverable format (likely plaintext or weakly encrypted) in its settings database rather than using proper password hashing. A local attacker with database access can recover the plaintext password and use it to modify program settings, effectively achieving privilege escalation.

MitigationUpgrade to version 4.4.2 or later which implements proper password hashing. Until then, restrict local access to the settings database file and monitor for unauthorized modifications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise SuiteApplication
Affected:< 4.4.2
SyswatchApplication
Affected:< 4.4.2
TpsecureApplication
Affected:< 4.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Safensoft product and version
    Locate the Safensoft application (Enterprise Suite, Syswatch, or Tpsecure) in your programs and check the installed version number. This is typically found in Add/Remove Programs, the application's About dialog, or the program directory.
    Affected if The installed version is any version below 4.4.2 (e.g., 4.3.0, 4.2.1, etc.)
  2. Locate the SysWatch settings database
    Search for the settings database file used by the SysWatch service. Common locations include the application data folder or the program's configuration directory. The file may have extensions like .db, .sqlite, or .mdb.
    Affected if The settings database file exists and contains user or administrative credential records.
  3. Inspect password storage format in the database
    Open or query the settings database file using an appropriate tool (database viewer, SQLite browser, or text editor if it's a plain file). Locate tables or fields that store username/password pairs. Examine whether passwords appear in plaintext, Base64-encoded, or weakly encrypted rather than as salted hash values.
    Affected if Passwords are stored in plaintext, Base64, or any reversible encoding instead of being stored as cryptographic hashes.
  4. Verify file access permissions on the database
    Check file system permissions on the settings database file. Determine which local users or groups have read access to this file.
    Affected if Any local user account other than the SYSTEM account or designated administrators can read the database file.

You are affected if any Safensoft product (Enterprise Suite, Syswatch, or Tpsecure) version is below 4.4.2 and the settings database contains passwords in a recoverable (plaintext or weakly encrypted) format accessible to non-admin users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.4.2 or later
Fixed in 4.4.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to version 4.4.2 or later which implements proper password hashing. Until then, restrict local access to the settings database file and monitor for unauthorized modifications.

Fix this in Enterprise Suite Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13014 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data