JiraApplication · Atlassian

CVE-2018-13391

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-08-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.6.8 / 7.7.5 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The ProfileLinkUserFormat component of Jira Server before version 7.6.8, from version 7.7.0 before version 7.7.5, from version 7.8.0 before version 7.8.5, from version 7.9.0 before version 7.9.3, from version 7.10.0 before version 7.10.3 and from version 7.11.0 before version 7.11.2 allows remote attackers who can access & view an issue to obtain the email address of the reporter and assignee user of an issue despite the configured email visibility setting being set to hidden.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ProfileLinkUserFormat component in Jira Server fails to respect the email visibility setting configured to hide user email addresses. An attacker who can view an issue (even with limited access) can obtain the email addresses of the reporter and assignee, bypassing the intended privacy controls.

MitigationUpgrade Jira Server to version 7.6.8, 7.7.5, 7.8.5, 7.9.3, 7.10.3, 7.11.2 or later. As a temporary mitigation, restrict issue view access to only trusted users until the upgrade can be completed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JiraApplication
Affected:< 7.6.8
Jira ServerApplication
Affected:>= 7.7.0, < 7.7.5>= 7.8.0, < 7.8.5>= 7.9.0, < 7.9.3>= 7.10.0, < 7.10.3>= 7.11.0, < 7.11.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Jira version
    Check the Jira application version by accessing /rest/api/2/serverInfo or looking at the footer of any Jira page
    Affected if The installed version falls within < 7.6.8, OR >= 7.7.0 and < 7.7.5, OR >= 7.8.0 and < 7.8.5, OR >= 7.9.0 and < 7.9.3, OR >= 7.10.0 and < 7.10.3, OR >= 7.11.0 and < 7.11.2
  2. Verify email visibility setting configuration
    Navigate to Administration > User Management > User Privacy or check the 'Hide Email Addresses' setting in Jira global settings
    Affected if Email visibility is configured to hide addresses but is not being respected by the ProfileLinkUserFormat component
  3. Confirm ProfileLinkUserFormat is in use
    Inspect issue views (particularly reporter and assignee fields) in the web interface or via REST API to see if user profile links are displayed
    Affected if User profile links containing email addresses appear in issue views despite privacy settings
  4. Test issue access with limited user
    Create or use a test account with minimal issue view permissions and attempt to view an issue where the reporter/assignee email should be hidden
    Affected if The limited user can see the email addresses of reporters or assignees in the issue view

A user is affected if their Jira Server version is within the affected ranges AND they have users with email visibility restrictions configured AND limited-access users can view reporter/assignee email addresses in issues.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.6.8 / 7.7.5 / 7.8.5 or later
Fixed in 7.6.87.7.57.8.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jira Server to version 7.6.8, 7.7.5, 7.8.5, 7.9.3, 7.10.3, 7.11.2 or later. As a temporary mitigation, restrict issue view access to only trusted users until the upgrade can be completed.

Fix this in Jira Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13391 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13391 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data