Cp 1604 FirmwareOperating system · Siemens

CVE-2018-13810

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.8 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in CP 1604 (All versions), CP 1616 (All versions). The integrated configuration web server of the affected CP devices could allow a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack if an unsuspecting user is tricked into accessing a malicious link. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by a legitimate user. A successful attack could allow an attacker to trigger actions via the web interface that the legitimate user is allowed to perform. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this vulnerability was known.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CSRF vulnerability in the integrated configuration web server of Siemens CP 1604 and CP 1616 industrial communication processors. Attackers can trick authenticated users into unknowingly submitting malicious requests via the web interface, allowing unauthorized actions to be performed with the privileges of the legitimate user.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens or SameSite cookie attributes on all state-changing web interface operations; verify Origin/Referer headers server-side. Since all versions are affected, contact Siemens for firmware updates containing CSRF protection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cp 1604 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 2.8
Cp 1616 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 2.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the device management interface or check the device label to confirm the model number is Siemens CP 1604 or CP 1616
    Affected if The device is a CP 1604 or CP 1616 communication processor
  2. Check the firmware version
    Log into the device configuration interface or use the device management software to view the installed firmware version
    Affected if The firmware version is 2.8 or lower
  3. Verify the web interface is enabled
    Access the integrated configuration web server by navigating to the device IP address via HTTP/HTTPS in a browser or use a web vulnerability scanner to confirm the web interface responds
    Affected if The web interface is accessible and responds to requests
  4. Check for anti-CSRF protections in web responses
    Inspect the HTML forms and AJAX requests in the web interface for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens or examine the Set-Cookie headers for SameSite attributes
    Affected if No anti-CSRF tokens are found in state-changing forms or SameSite attributes are missing from session cookies

The environment is affected if the device is a CP 1604 or CP 1616 with firmware version 2.8 or lower and the integrated configuration web server is enabled, with no CSRF tokens present in the web interface.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.8
Interim mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens or SameSite cookie attributes on all state-changing web interface operations; verify Origin/Referer headers server-side. Since all versions are affected, contact Siemens for firmware updates containing CSRF protection.

Fix this in Cp 1604 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13810 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data