Bento4Application · Axiosys

CVE-2018-13847

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been found in Bento4 1.5.1-624. It is a SEGV in AP4_StcoAtom::AdjustChunkOffsets in Core/Ap4StcoAtom.cpp.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A segmentation fault (SEGV) vulnerability exists in Bento4 version 1.5.1-624 within the AP4_StcoAtom::AdjustChunkOffsets function in Core/Ap4StcoAtom.cpp. The STCO atom contains chunk offset tables for MP4 files, and improper handling during offset adjustment leads to memory access violations, causing a denial-of-service condition when processing specially crafted MP4 files.

MitigationRestrict processing of MP4 files from untrusted sources with Bento4 library until a patched version is available; implement input validation on STCO atom data before passing to AdjustChunkOffsets to prevent out-of-bounds memory access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bento4Application
Affected:= 1.5.1-624

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Bento4 library version
    Locate the Bento4 library binary or header file and check its version metadata. If using command-line tools like mp4extract, run 'mp4extract --version' or check the library file properties. If linked as a library, inspect the library filename or embedded version string.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.5.1-624
  2. Confirm MP4 file processing capability
    Determine whether your application or tool using Bento4 is configured to parse or manipulate MP4 files. Check configuration files, command-line arguments, or runtime settings that enable MP4 input handling.
    Affected if The application processes MP4 files as input
  3. Verify STCO atom handling is in use
    Examine whether the MP4 parsing code path includes the STCO atom (chunk offset table) processing. This typically occurs when reading or modifying MP4 file structure, especially when adjusting chunk offsets during file modification or analysis.
    Affected if The application reads or modifies the STCO atom in MP4 files being processed
  4. Check for untrusted MP4 input sources
    Review whether the system accepts MP4 files from external or untrusted sources without prior validation. This includes web uploads, file parsing services, or media processing pipelines handling content from users or external systems.
    Affected if MP4 files from untrusted or external sources are processed

You are affected if your Bento4 installation is exactly version 1.5.1-624 AND your application processes MP4 files that could contain crafted STCO atom data from potentially untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict processing of MP4 files from untrusted sources with Bento4 library until a patched version is available; implement input validation on STCO atom data before passing to AdjustChunkOffsets to prevent out-of-bounds memory access.

Fix this in Bento4 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13847 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data