Api ConnectApplication · Ibm

CVE-2018-1389

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0.8.2 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.2 is impacted by generated LoopBack APIs for a Model using the BelongsTo/HasMany relationship allowing unauthorized modification of information. IBM X-Force ID: 138213.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.2 generates LoopBack APIs for models with BelongsTo/HasMany relationships that lack proper authorization controls, allowing authenticated users with limited privileges to modify data they should not have access to.

MitigationApply IBM API Connect security patches for versions 5.0.0.0-5.0.8.2 or upgrade to a supported version. Review and enforce proper ACL (Access Control List) rules on LoopBack models using BelongsTo/HasMany relationships.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Api ConnectApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0.0, <= 5.0.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check IBM API Connect version
    Locate the installed version of IBM API Connect in the system. This is typically found in the product's About section, installation directory, or by querying the API Connect management interface. Common locations include the Cloud Management console under Settings or the installation logs.
    Affected if The installed version is between 5.0.0.0 and 5.0.8.2 inclusive.
  2. Identify LoopBack model definitions
    Locate the LoopBack model definition files in your API Connect project. These are typically JSON files in the /common/models/ or similar directory structure, with filenames matching your model names and containing 'relations' sections.
    Affected if LoopBack models with BelongsTo or HasMany relationship definitions exist in the project.
  3. Inspect relationship configurations
    Open each model's JSON definition file and examine the 'relations' section. Look for entries that specify 'belongsTo' or 'hasMany' as the relation type. Document which models have these relationships configured.
    Affected if Models contain BelongsTo or HasMany relationship definitions in the model JSON files.
  4. Verify ACL rules on related models
    Examine the 'acls' array in each model definition file that contains BelongsTo/HasMany relationships. Check whether ACL rules are explicitly defined for the related model access paths (such as modelName.relationName access). Look for 'accessType' and 'permission' settings in the ACL configuration.
    Affected if No explicit ACL rules are defined for BelongsTo/HasMany relationship access paths, or ACLs permit access that should be restricted.

You are affected if your IBM API Connect version is 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.2 AND you use LoopBack models with BelongsTo/HasMany relationships that lack proper ACL rules for controlling access through those relationships.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0.8.2
Interim mitigation

Apply IBM API Connect security patches for versions 5.0.0.0-5.0.8.2 or upgrade to a supported version. Review and enforce proper ACL (Access Control List) rules on LoopBack models using BelongsTo/HasMany relationships.

Fix this in Api Connect Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1389 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data