CVE-2018-14343
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ASN.1 BER dissector in Wireshark versions 2.2.0-2.2.15, 2.4.0-2.4.7, and 2.6.0-2.6.1 lacks proper bounds checking on length values, allowing malformed packets with length values exceeding the maximum signed integer to trigger a crash (denial of service). The fix adds validation in packet-ber.c to reject oversized length values before processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.2.0, <= 2.2.15>= 2.4.0, <= 2.4.7>= 2.6.0, <= 2.6.1= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Wireshark versionRun 'wireshark --version' or open Wireshark and go to Help > AboutAffected if Version is 2.2.0-2.2.15, 2.4.0-2.4.7, or 2.6.0-2.6.1
-
Confirm Wireshark BER dissector is presentCheck that the 'packet-ber.c' dissector file exists in the Wireshark installation directory (epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c in source, or inspect the installed epan/dissectors folder)Affected if The BER dissector is available (it is included by default in Wireshark installations) and the version is in the affected range above
-
Verify processing of BER/ASN.1 trafficInspect any packet capture files or live captures that may contain ASN.1 BER encoded protocols (such as SNMP, LDAP, PKI certificates, Diameter, etc.)Affected if You process BER/ASN.1 traffic with an affected Wireshark version - malformed packets with oversized length values can trigger the crash
You are affected if Wireshark version 2.2.0-2.2.15, 2.4.0-2.4.7, or 2.6.0-2.6.1 is installed and you process BER/ASN.1 encoded packet data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Wireshark 2.6.2, 2.4.8, or 2.2.16 or later. Alternatively, avoid opening untrusted packet capture files or live capture from untrusted sources until patched.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-14343 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-14343 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data