Mp4v2Application · Techsmith

CVE-2018-14379

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-07-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MP4Atom::factory in mp4atom.cpp in MP4v2 2.0.0 incorrectly uses the MP4ItemAtom data type in a certain case where MP4DataAtom is required, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted MP4 file, because access to the data structure has different expectations about layout as a result of this type confusion.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A type confusion vulnerability in MP4v2 2.0.0 allows the MP4Atom::factory function to incorrectly instantiate an MP4ItemAtom when MP4DataAtom is required. Because these atom types have different memory layouts, this causes memory corruption when the code accesses the data with incorrect expectations about its structure. Attackers can exploit this via specially crafted MP4 files.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of MP4v2 or apply a code fix to ensure the factory method uses MP4DataAtom when MP4DataAtom is required, not MP4ItemAtom. Validate and sanitize MP4 files before processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mp4v2Application
Affected:= 2.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MP4v2 library presence
    Search for MP4v2 library files (libmp4v2.dll on Windows, libmp4v2.so on Linux) or check if applications using MP4v2 are installed. Use commands like 'find / -name "*mp4v2*"' on Linux or check installed programs on Windows.
    Affected if MP4v2 library version 2.0.0 is found on the system
  2. Determine MP4v2 version
    Run version check command if available, or inspect the library file properties. On Linux: 'dpkg -l | grep mp4v2' or check library metadata. On Windows: right-click the DLL and view Properties > Details for version info.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.0.0
  3. Identify applications using MP4v2
    Review which applications on the system depend on or use MP4v2 for MP4 file processing. Check application dependencies or documentation.
    Affected if Applications processing MP4 files rely on MP4v2 version 2.0.0
  4. Check for MP4 file processing workflows
    Review whether the system or its applications accept and process MP4 files from external or untrusted sources. Examine file upload features, media processing tools, or any functionality that parses MP4 containers.
    Affected if MP4 files are processed using the vulnerable MP4v2 2.0.0 library

A system is affected if MP4v2 version 2.0.0 is installed and is used to process MP4 files, particularly when MP4DataAtom parsing is triggered by crafted files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of MP4v2 or apply a code fix to ensure the factory method uses MP4DataAtom when MP4DataAtom is required, not MP4ItemAtom. Validate and sanitize MP4 files before processing.

Fix this in Mp4v2 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-14379 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-14379 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data