CVE-2018-14659
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Gluster file system through versions 4.1.4 and 3.1.2 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack via use of the 'GF_XATTR_IOSTATS_DUMP_KEY' xattr. A remote, authenticated attacker could exploit this by mounting a Gluster volume and repeatedly calling 'setxattr(2)' to trigger a state dump and create an arbitrary number of files in the server's runtime directory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceGlusterFS through versions 4.1.4 and 3.1.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability via the GF_XATTR_IOSTATS_DUMP_KEY extended attribute. A remote, authenticated attacker can mount a Gluster volume and repeatedly call setxattr(2) to trigger state dumps, creating an arbitrary number of files in the server's runtime directory and exhausting disk/resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, <= 3.1.2>= 4.1.0, <= 4.1.4= 8.0= 9.0= 6.0= 7.0= 4.0= 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GlusterFS versionRun 'glusterfs --version' or check the package manager (rpm -q glusterfs-server or dpkg -l glusterfs)Affected if The installed version falls within 3.0.0-3.1.2 or 4.1.0-4.1.4, meaning it is vulnerable
-
Verify Gluster services are runningRun 'glusterd --version' or check for glusterd process via 'ps aux | grep gluster'Affected if Gluster services are active and the vulnerable version is installed
-
Inspect runtime directory for state dump filesCheck the Gluster runtime directory (commonly /var/run/gluster or /run/gluster) for an unusually high number of state dump files (*.dump or *state* files)Affected if A large number of state dump files exist, indicating possible exploitation
-
Review authentication and volume accessVerify which users or clients have permission to mount and access Gluster volumes by examining /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol or volume configuration filesAffected if Unauthenticated or unauthorized users can mount volumes, increasing exposure to remote attackers
-
Check logs for excessive setxattr operationsSearch Gluster logs (typically in /var/log/glusterfs/) for repeated setxattr calls involving 'iostats' or 'GF_XATTR_IOSTATS_DUMP_KEY'Affected if Logs show repeated setxattr operations to the vulnerable xattr key, indicating active exploitation attempts
A system is affected if it runs GlusterFS versions 3.0.0-3.1.2 or 4.1.0-4.1.4 and has the volume accessible to remote authenticated attackers, especially if state dump files or repeated setxattr activity are observed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade GlusterFS to a patched version. Additionally, implement access controls and monitoring for excessive setxattr operations to detect exploitation attempts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-14659 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-14659 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data