CVE-2018-15317
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.2.1-11.6.3.2, an attacker sending specially crafted SSL records to a SSL Virtual Server will cause corruption in the SSL data structures leading to intermittent decrypt BAD_RECORD_MAC errors. Clients will be unable to access the application load balanced by a virtual server with an SSL profile until tmm is restarted.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP SSL virtual servers allows remote attackers to send specially crafted SSL records that corrupt SSL data structures in the TMM process, causing intermittent BAD_RECORD_MAC decryption errors and making applications unreachable until TMM is restarted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3.5>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0.7>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP versionRun `tmsh show /sys version` or check the version file at `/etc/version` to determine the installed BIG-IP versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 11.2.1-11.5.6, 11.6.0-11.6.3.2, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 13.0.0-13.1.0.7, or 14.0.0-14.0.0.2
-
Locate SSL virtual serversRun `tmsh list /ltm virtual all` and look for virtual servers that reference SSL profiles (clientSsl or serverSsl) in their configurationAffected if SSL virtual servers are configured and exposed to untrusted network traffic
-
Review TMM logs for decryption errorsCheck the TMM log at `/var/log/ltm` or run `tmsh show /ltm virtual stats` looking for BAD_RECORD_MAC error messages or high decryption failure countsAffected if BAD_RECORD_MAC errors appear in logs or virtual server statistics show abnormal decryption failure rates
-
Verify TMM process stabilityRun `tmsh show /sys tmm-info` and check for any TMM restarts or instability indicators in the system health statusAffected if TMM has restarted unexpectedly or shows instability without other known causes
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have SSL virtual servers exposed to network traffic, especially if you observe BAD_RECORD_MAC errors or unexplained TMM instability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a patched BIG-IP version (14.1.0+, 13.1.2+, 12.1.5+, 11.6.4+) as specified in F5 advisory K42323434. Consider implementing SSL/TLS inspection policies to filter malformed SSL records at the edge.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15317 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data