CVE-2018-15320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2 or 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, undisclosed traffic patterns may lead to denial of service conditions for the BIG-IP system. The configuration which exposes this condition is the BIG-IP self IP address which is part of a VLAN group and has the Port Lockdown setting configured with anything other than "allow-all".
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOn BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2 and 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, undisclosed traffic patterns directed at a self IP address that is part of a VLAN group and has Port Lockdown configured to anything other than 'allow-all' can trigger a denial of service condition, causing the system to become unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1.1>= 14.0.0, <= 14.0.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP product versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or view the web UI at System > Software Management > Images to identify the installed BIG-IP versionAffected if Version is 13.0.0-13.1.1.1 or 14.0.0-14.0.0.2
-
Identify self IP addressesRun 'tmsh list net self all' or view Network > Self IPs in the web UI to list all configured self IP addressesAffected if Self IPs exist on the system
-
Determine if self IPs are members of VLAN groupsFor each self IP, examine the 'vlan' or 'vlan-group' field in the output from 'tmsh list net self <self-ip-name>' to see if it belongs to a VLAN or VLAN groupAffected if Any self IP has a 'vlan-group' assigned (not just a single 'vlan')
-
Check Port Lockdown setting on self IPs in VLAN groupsRun 'tmsh list net self all' and look for the 'port-lockdown' field for each self IP that is part of a VLAN groupAffected if Port Lockdown is set to anything other than 'allow-all' (such as 'allow-default' or 'allow-none')
System is affected only if running a vulnerable version AND has at least one self IP that is a member of a VLAN group with Port Lockdown configured to something other than 'allow-all'.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEither change the Port Lockdown setting to 'allow-all' on affected self IPs that are members of VLAN groups, or upgrade to a patched BIG-IP version that addresses this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data