CVE-2018-15404
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web interface of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) Supervisor and Cisco UCS Director could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient restrictions on the size or total amount of resources allowed via the web interface. An attacker who has valid credentials for the application could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted or malformed HTTP request to the web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause oversubscription of system resources or cause a component to become unresponsive, resulting in a DoS condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe web interfaces of Cisco IMC Supervisor and Cisco UCS Director lack proper restrictions on resource consumption, allowing authenticated attackers to send malformed HTTP requests that overconsume system resources, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.6\(0.0\)= 2.1\(0.0\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco productCheck system for presence of Cisco Integrated Management Controller Supervisor or Cisco Unified Computing System Director. Query installed packages or check application directories for these product names.Affected if Neither product is installed (not affected)
-
Determine installed version of Cisco UCS DirectorUse command line or web interface to query the version of Cisco UCS Director. Common methods: check the About page in the web GUI, or use CLI command 'show version' if SSH access is available.Affected if Version equals 6.6(0.0)
-
Determine installed version of Cisco IMC SupervisorUse command line or web interface to query the version of Cisco IMC Supervisor. Common methods: check the About page in the web GUI, or use CLI command 'show version' if SSH access is available.Affected if Version equals 2.1(0.0)
-
Verify web interface is accessibleCheck if the web management interface is exposed and reachable. Attempt to access the HTTPS management portal or check network listener status for HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 443 or 8443).Affected if Web interface is enabled and accessible (required for exploitation)
-
Check for existing resource limit configurationsInspect web server configuration files or management interface settings for any rate limiting, request size limits, or resource consumption restrictions. Look for configuration parameters related to request throttling or max request size.Affected if No resource limits are configured on the web interface
User is affected if either Cisco UCS Director version 6.6(0.0) or Cisco IMC Supervisor version 2.1(0.0) is running AND the web management interface is exposed without resource limits configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement resource limits and input validation on the web interface to restrict request sizes and rates; apply available Cisco patches for this vulnerability.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15404 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15404 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data