CVE-2018-15443
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) rule that inspects certain types of TCP traffic. The vulnerability is due to incorrect TCP retransmission handling. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TCP connection request through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured IPS rules and allow uninspected traffic onto the network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Firepower System Software contains a vulnerability in its IPS detection engine where incorrect TCP retransmission handling allows attackers to craft specific TCP connection requests that bypass configured intrusion prevention rules. By sending specially crafted TCP packets with manipulated retransmission sequences, an unauthenticated remote attacker can cause the IPS to fail to inspect certain TCP traffic, permitting uninspected connections onto the protected network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco Firepower System Software is deployedIdentify the installed product by checking system inventory, running processes (e.g., 'show version' on the device), or network device identification. Cisco Firepower is typically deployed as a physical appliance, virtual appliance, or integrated with Cisco ASA with FirePOWER module.Affected if The system is running Cisco Firepower System Software - all versions are affected by this vulnerability.
-
Verify IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) is enabledAccess the Firepower Management Center or run appropriate CLI commands (e.g., 'show intrusion-config' or check the assigned intrusion policy) to determine if an IPS policy is actively applied to any security zone or interface.Affected if IPS inspection is enabled and processing traffic - the bypass only affects traffic that should be inspected by the IPS detection engine.
-
Assess network exposure to untrusted sourcesReview Firepower interface configurations and security zone assignments to identify any interfaces accepting TCP connections from untrusted or external networks (such as internet-facing interfaces or DMZ connections).Affected if The Firepower device is processing TCP traffic from untrusted/external sources - the attacker requires the ability to send crafted TCP packets to the protected interface.
-
Review intrusion events for inspection gapsAnalyze intrusion event logs in the Firepower Management Center for any anomalies such as missing inspection events on active connections, unusual TCP session patterns, or connections that bypassed IPS inspection. Look for events with unusual TCP flags or retransmission patterns.Affected if There are gaps in intrusion inspection logs or connections that passed without expected IPS evaluation, potentially indicating the bypass was exploited.
You are affected if you run Cisco Firepower System Software with IPS enabled on interfaces exposed to untrusted TCP traffic, since all versions of this product contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco security patch for this vulnerability to the Firepower System Software; until patched, consider implementing additional network-layer controls or compensating detection mechanisms to identify bypassed traffic.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15443 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15443 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data