SuitecrmApplication · Salesagility

CVE-2018-15606

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-09-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.8.21 / 7.10.8 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An XSS issue was discovered in SalesAgility SuiteCRM 7.x before 7.8.21 and 7.10.x before 7.10.8, related to phishing an error message.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in SalesAgility SuiteCRM versions 7.x before 7.8.21 and 7.10.x before 7.10.8. The flaw is tied to error message handling where user-supplied input is rendered unsanitized, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts into error messages tophish users or steal session credentials.

MitigationUpgrade to SuiteCRM 7.8.21, 7.10.8, or later. Alternatively, implement input validation and output encoding on error handling routines to neutralize script injection before deployment of official patches.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuitecrmApplication
Affected:>= 7.0.0, < 7.8.21>= 7.10.0, < 7.10.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SuiteCRM version
    Locate the version file in your SuiteCRM installation, typically found in the root directory or in a file named 'suitecrm_version.php' or similar version indicator file. Open the file to read the exact version number installed.
    Affected if The installed version is 7.0.0 or higher but below 7.8.21, or 7.10.0 or higher but below 7.10.8.
  2. Verify error display is enabled
    Check the SuiteCRM configuration file (usually config.php or config_override.php in the root directory) for settings related to error_display or developerMode. Look for variables that control whether PHP errors, warnings, or system messages are displayed to users.
    Affected if Error display is enabled and user-supplied input can be reflected back into error messages.
  3. Review custom error handling
    Examine any custom error handlers or third-party modules that process user input and generate error messages. Check the codebase for calls to functions like die, exit, or custom error display routines that may not use output encoding.
    Affected if Custom error handling routines render user input without sanitization before displaying error messages.
  4. Test for reflected XSS in error scenarios
    Trigger error conditions by submitting malformed input to common fields (such as search fields, login forms, or module-specific inputs) and observe if the input is reflected verbatim in the resulting error message without encoding or escaping.
    Affected if User-supplied input appears unescaped in error message output, indicating the vulnerability is present and exploitable.

You are affected if your SuiteCRM installation runs version 7.0.0 to 7.8.20, or 7.10.0 to 7.10.7, and error messages can display user input without sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.8.21 / 7.10.8 or later
Fixed in 7.8.217.10.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to SuiteCRM 7.8.21, 7.10.8, or later. Alternatively, implement input validation and output encoding on error handling routines to neutralize script injection before deployment of official patches.

Fix this in Suitecrm Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15606 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data