Cf NetworkingApplication · Cloud Foundry

CVE-2018-15755

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-10-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.16.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cloud Foundry CF Networking Release, versions 2.11.0 prior to 2.16.0, contain an internal api endpoint vulnerable to SQL injection between Diego cells and the policy server. A remote authenticated malicious user with mTLS certs can issue arbitrary SQL queries and gain access to the policy server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cloud Foundry CF Networking Release contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the internal API endpoint of the policy server. This endpoint, which handles communication between Diego cells and the policy server, does not properly sanitize SQL queries. An authenticated attacker with valid mTLS certificates can inject arbitrary SQL statements, potentially exfiltrating data or gaining unauthorized access to the policy server database.

MitigationUpgrade CF Networking Release to version 2.16.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, review and rotate any credentials or certificates that may have been exposed, and audit the policy server database for signs of unauthorized access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cf NetworkingApplication
Affected:>= 2.11.0, < 2.16.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the CF Networking Release version
    Query your Cloud Foundry deployment's deployed releases using 'bosh releases' or your deployment manifest to obtain the exact version number of the cf-networking release
    Affected if The version falls within the range >= 2.11.0 and < 2.16.0
  2. Confirm the policy server component is deployed
    Check if the policy-server or policy-server-internal component is running in your Diego cells or as a BOSH job. Use 'bosh vms' or your orchestration tool to list running instances with the policy-server job
    Affected if The policy server job is deployed and running in your environment
  3. Verify the internal API endpoint is accessible
    Check the network configuration and routing for the policy-server-internal API. Inspect the BOSH job properties for policy-server-internal to determine if the internal API port is bound and routable between cells and the policy server
    Affected if The internal API endpoint is network-accessible from Diego cells (typically on port 8080 or as defined in your deployment)
  4. Confirm mTLS authentication is in use
    Review the policy-server-internal job configuration and confirm that mutual TLS authentication is enabled for inter-component communication between Diego cells and the policy server
    Affected if mTLS is configured, which satisfies the authentication requirement for this exploit

Your environment is affected if the deployed CF Networking Release version is between 2.11.0 (inclusive) and 2.16.0 (exclusive) and the policy server internal API is accessible with mTLS authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.16.0 or later
Fixed in 2.16.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade CF Networking Release to version 2.16.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, review and rotate any credentials or certificates that may have been exposed, and audit the policy server database for signs of unauthorized access.

Fix this in Cf Networking Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15755 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data