CVE-2018-15967
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Flash Player versions 30.0.0.154 and earlier have a privilege escalation vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Flash Player versions 30.0.0.154 and earlier contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that could allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges and access sensitive information. The vulnerability is exploitable through maliciously crafted Flash content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.0= 6.0<= 31.0.0.108<= 31.0.0.108CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Flash Player is installedCheck for Flash plugin in browser (navigate to 'about:plugins' in Firefox or 'chrome://plugins' in Chrome, or check Add/Remove Programs on Windows, or run 'rpm -qa | grep -i flash' on Linux)Affected if Flash Player is present on the system
-
Determine installed Flash versionOn Windows, check 'C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash\Flash.ocx' properties or use browser plugin page. On Linux, run 'rpm -q flash-plugin' or check version in browser plugin listAffected if Version is 31.0.0.108 or earlier, or 30.0.0.154 or earlier (the fix was released after these versions)
-
Confirm Flash is enabled in browsersIn browser plugin settings, verify that Flash is not set to 'Never Activate' or 'Block'. Check browser plugin list for Flash statusAffected if Flash is enabled and can be invoked by malicious content
-
Check for RHEL flash-plugin packageOn Red Hat systems, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i flash' or 'yum list installed flash-plugin' to see if the Red Hat Flash plugin package is installedAffected if The flash-plugin package is installed with a version corresponding to vulnerable Flash releases
You are affected if Adobe Flash Player is installed, enabled, and running a version at or below 31.0.0.108 (or 30.0.0.154 based on the specific flaw description). If Flash is uninstalled or fully disabled in all browsers, you are not affected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Adobe Flash Player to a version newer than 30.0.0.154, or preferably uninstall Flash Player entirely since Adobe reached end-of-life in December 2020.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15967 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15967 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data