LogontracerApplication · Jpcert

CVE-2018-16167

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-01-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
LogonTracer 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

LogonTracer versions 1.2.0 and earlier contains a critical remote command execution vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the target host. The specific injection point is not detailed in the CVE, but the severe CVSS score indicates trivial exploitability.

MitigationUpgrade LogonTracer to the latest patched version immediately. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict all network access to the LogonTracer service (e.g., firewall rules, network segmentation) to prevent unauthenticated exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LogontracerApplication
Affected:<= 1.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify LogonTracer version
    Locate the LogonTracer installation and check its version metadata (such as a version file, --version output, or package manager record)
    Affected if The installed version is 1.2.0 or any earlier version
  2. Confirm LogonTracer is running
    Identify the LogonTracer process or service on the host system and verify it is active
    Affected if LogonTracer is currently running on the system
  3. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the LogonTracer web interface or API is accessible from network addresses other than localhost
    Affected if LogonTracer is listening on a network interface and accessible to unauthenticated remote users
  4. Verify authentication configuration
    Inspect LogonTracer configuration files or settings to confirm whether authentication is enabled and enforced for the web interface
    Affected if Authentication is disabled, optional, or misconfigured such that anonymous access is permitted

If LogonTracer version 1.2.0 or earlier is running and is network-accessible without authentication enforced, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2018-16167.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade LogonTracer to the latest patched version immediately. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict all network access to the LogonTracer service (e.g., firewall rules, network segmentation) to prevent unauthenticated exploitation.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Version newer than 1.2.0 (e.g., 1.2.1 or latest stable release)

  1. 1. Back up your current LogonTracer installation and configuration
  2. 2. Check the official LogonTracer GitHub repository (github.com/JPCERTCC/LogonTracer) for the latest release
  3. 3. Download the version newer than 1.2.0 (likely 1.2.1 or later)
  4. 4. Stop the LogonTracer service
  5. 5. Replace the existing installation with the new version
  6. 6. Restore your configuration from the backup
  7. 7. Start the LogonTracer service
  8. 8. Verify the service is running correctly
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or dependency changes between your version and the new version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Logontracer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,780
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-16167 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-16167 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data