CVE-2018-16266
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Enlightenment system service in Tizen allows an unprivileged process to fully control or capture windows, due to improper D-Bus security policy configurations. This affects Tizen before 5.0 M1, and Tizen-based firmwares including Samsung Galaxy Gear series before build RE2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Enlightenment system service in Tizen contains improper D-Bus security policy configurations that allow an unprivileged process to invoke privileged methods, enabling full control over or capture of windows from other applications. This is a service authorization failure where D-Bus method access controls are either missing or incorrectly configured.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 2.0= 2.1= 2.2= 2.2.1= 2.3= 2.3.1= 2.4= 3.0= 4.0= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the system is running TizenCheck for Tizen-specific markers: look for /etc/tizen-release or /usr/lib/tizen-release, or examine /etc/os-release for 'Tizen' in the NAME or ID fieldsAffected if The system is not Tizen-based (this CVE only applies to Tizen)
-
Check the Tizen versionRead the version from /etc/tizen-release or from /etc/os-release (VERSION_ID field). Compare against the affected range: 1.0 through 5.0Affected if The installed Tizen version is 1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.4, 3.0, 4.0, or 5.0
-
Confirm Enlightenment service is presentCheck if the Enlightenment D-Bus service exists: look for policy files in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ containing 'enlightenment' or 'enlightenment.conf', or list D-Bus system services related to enlightenment using dbus-send --system --dest=org.freedesktop.DBus --type=method_call --print-reply /org/freedesktop/DBus org.freedesktop.DBus.ListNamesAffected if Enlightenment service is not present on the system
-
Inspect D-Bus security policy for EnlightenmentExamine the Enlightenment D-Bus policy file in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ (typically enlightenment.conf or similar). Look for <allow> elements with missing or overly permissive <send_method_call> permissions, particularly for window control or capture interfaces. Check if any unprivileged connection is permitted to invoke privileged methodsAffected if The D-Bus policy allows unprivileged processes to call privileged methods on the Enlightenment service (missing or permissive <send_method_call> rules, or absent <policy> restrictions for the connection)
-
Verify D-Bus method access controls are missing or misconfiguredReview the policy XML for sections governing method access. Look for: (1) absence of <policy user="..."> with explicit <deny> rules, (2) presence of <allow> without corresponding authentication requirements, or (3) missing interface-specific method restrictions. Compare against secure D-Bus policy patternsAffected if The Enlightenment D-Bus interface lacks proper <deny> rules or authentication constraints for sensitive window control methods, enabling unprivileged access
A system is affected if it runs Tizen versions 1.0 through 5.0 with the Enlightenment service and has permissive or missing D-Bus method access controls that allow unprivileged processes to invoke privileged window control methods.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Tizen to version 5.0 M1 or later which contains corrected D-Bus security policies, or manually restrict the Enlightenment service's D-Bus method permissions to prevent unprivileged access to window control interfaces.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-16266 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-16266 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data