CVE-2018-16465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing state in Nextcloud Server prior to 14.0.0 would not enforce the use of a second factor at login if the the provider of the second factor failed to load.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNextcloud Server prior to 14.0.0 contains a missing state validation in its two-factor authentication (2FA) mechanism. When the second factor provider fails to load during login, the system does not enforce the 2FA requirement, potentially allowing users to bypass second-factor authentication and gain access with only username and password.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 14.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Nextcloud Server versionCheck the Nextcloud admin panel, the version file, or use the occ command: 'occ --version' to determine the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is prior to 14.0.0 (e.g., 13.x.x or earlier)
-
Confirm Two-Factor Authentication is enabledNavigate to the Nextcloud admin settings or check the user configuration to see if any 2FA provider has been enabled for usersAffected if 2FA is enabled and the server version is below 14.0.0
-
Verify the 2FA provider can load successfullyTest the login flow with a user who has 2FA configured, or check the 2FA provider logs/status in the Nextcloud admin panel to see if any providers report failures during authenticationAffected if The 2FA provider fails to load or initialize during login attempts while the server version is below 14.0.0
A Nextcloud Server installation is affected if it runs a version lower than 14.0.0 and has Two-Factor Authentication enabled, as the 2FA enforcement can be bypassed when the provider fails to load.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data14.0.0
Upgrade to Nextcloud Server 14.0.0 or later which includes proper state handling to enforce 2FA even when the provider fails to load.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-16465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-16465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data