CVE-2018-1659
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager 5.0 through 5.02 and 6.0 through 6.0.6 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 144885.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager (RELM) versions 5.0-5.02 and 6.0-6.0.6 allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code into the Web UI. This enables session hijacking and credential disclosure within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0, <= 5.0.2>= 6.0, <= 6.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager is installedLook for RELM processes running on the system (check task manager or running services for 'RELM', 'relm', or 'IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager' processes), or check for installation directories typically under IBM or Rational subfolders in Program Files on Windows or /opt on Linux/Unix.Affected if RELM software is found running or installed on the system
-
Determine the installed RELM versionAccess the RELM Web UI and navigate to the About page (usually /relm/about or similar), or check for version files in the installation directory, or use the RELM command line tool if available (relmVersion.bat or similar).Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not documented
-
Compare your version to the affected rangesMatch your installed version against the affected ranges: 5.0 through 5.0.2 OR 6.0 through 6.0.6. Versions 5.0.3+ and 6.0.1+ contain fixes.Affected if The installed version falls within 5.0-5.0.2 or 6.0-6.0.6 inclusive
-
Verify the Web UI is accessibleConfirm the RELM Web interface is reachable by accessing the application URL (typically https://hostname:port/relm or http://hostname:port/relm). Check that the HTTP/HTTPS service is listening.Affected if The Web UI is not accessible or not configured (reduces exposure but version may still be vulnerable)
-
Confirm authentication is enabledVerify that RELM user authentication is configured and active. Check that login is required to access the Web UI and that user accounts exist in the RELM user repository.Affected if Authentication is disabled (exploitation requires authenticated users to inject the XSS payload)
You are affected if IBM Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager is installed with a version between 5.0-5.0.2 or 6.0-6.0.6 and the Web UI with authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM-provided patches for RELM versions 5.0.3+ and 6.0.1, or upgrade to fixed releases. Implement input validation and output encoding on user-supplied data in the Web interface as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1659 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1659 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data