Business Automation WorkflowApplication · Ibm

CVE-2018-1674

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-09-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.5.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Business Process Manager 8.5 through 8.6 and 18.0.0.0 through 18.0.0.1 are vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 145109.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Business Process Manager versions 8.5 through 8.6 and 18.0.0.0 through 18.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL statements via specially-crafted input, enabling view, add, modify, or delete operations on the back-end database.

MitigationApply the IBM patch or upgrade to a fixed version of IBM Business Process Manager as specified in IBM's security bulletin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Business Automation WorkflowApplication
Affected:= 18.0.0.0= 18.0.0.1
Business Process ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 8.5.0.0, <= 8.5.0.2= 8.5.5.0= 8.5.6.0= 8.5.7.0= 8.6.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Business Process Manager or Business Automation Workflow version
    Locate the installation directory and check the version file or use the versionInfo command from the bin directory (versionInfo.sh or versionInfo.bat). Look for the product version in the output.
    Affected if The installed version matches 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.0.2, 8.5.5.0, 8.5.6.0, 8.5.7.0, 8.6.0.0, 18.0.0.0, or 18.0.0.1.
  2. Confirm the exact product name and build
    In the version output, verify the product name is either IBM Business Process Manager or IBM Business Automation Workflow and note the full build version number.
    Affected if The product is IBM Business Process Manager or IBM Business Automation Workflow at the affected versions listed.
  3. Check if Process Designer or Process Center is accessible
    Determine whether the web interface (Process Designer, Process Center, or Process Portal) is accessible over the network. Attempt to access the URLs typically used for these components.
    Affected if The web-based components are exposed to network users who could submit specially-crafted SQL input.
  4. Review exposed REST APIs and data access endpoints
    Identify any custom or built-in REST endpoints that accept user input and query the back-end database. Check WebSphere integration settings for exposed data services.
    Affected if REST APIs or data endpoints that accept SQL-like input from users are accessible without strict input validation.

You are affected if IBM Business Process Manager or IBM Business Automation Workflow is installed at versions 8.5.0.0 through 8.5.0.2, 8.5.5.0, 8.5.6.0, 8.5.7.0, 8.6.0.0, 18.0.0.0, or 18.0.0.1 and the web interface or REST APIs are network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.5.0.2
Interim mitigation

Apply the IBM patch or upgrade to a fixed version of IBM Business Process Manager as specified in IBM's security bulletin.

Fix this in Business Automation Workflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1674 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1674 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data