CVE-2018-17198
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-side Request Forgery (SSRF) and File Enumeration vulnerability in Apache Roller 5.2.1, 5.2.0 and earlier unsupported versions relies on Java SAX Parser to implement its XML-RPC interface and by default that parser supports external entities in XML DOCTYPE, which opens Roller up to SSRF / File Enumeration vulnerability. Note that this vulnerability exists even if Roller XML-RPC interface is disable via the Roller web admin UI. Mitigation: There are a couple of ways you can fix this vulnerability: 1) Upgrade to the latest version of Roller, which is now 5.2.2 2) Or, edit the Roller web.xml file and comment out the XML-RPC Servlet mapping as shown below: <!-- <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>XmlRpcServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/roller-services/xmlrpc</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> -->
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Roller versions 5.2.1 and earlier contain an SSRF and file enumeration vulnerability in its XML-RPC interface. The Java SAX Parser used for XML-RPC supports external entities in XML DOCTYPE, allowing attackers to make the server perform arbitrary HTTP requests or read local files. The vulnerability persists even when XML-RPC is disabled through the admin UI.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.1.2= 5.2.0= 5.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Roller versionLog into the Roller admin UI and navigate to the About page, or inspect the roller-war.jar/roller.jar file in the deployed WEB-INF/lib directory for the version manifestAffected if Version is 5.2.1, 5.2.0, 5.1.2, or any earlier version
-
Locate web.xml configuration fileFind the web.xml file in the deployed application's WEB-INF directory (typically at /WEB-INF/web.xml)Affected if File exists and contains servlet mappings for the XML-RPC interface
-
Verify XML-RPC servlet mapping statusInspect the web.xml file for a servlet-mapping with url-pattern matching /roller-xmlrpc/* or /xmlrpc/*, and check whether it is commented out or activeAffected if The XML-RPC servlet-mapping is present and not commented out (active)
-
Confirm XML-RPC endpoint accessibilitySend an HTTP request to the XML-RPC endpoint (e.g., GET /roller-xmlrpc/ or /xmlrpc/) and observe if the server respondsAffected if The endpoint returns any response (even an error) indicating the servlet is active
A user is affected if running Apache Roller version 5.2.1, 5.2.0, 5.1.2 or earlier AND the XML-RPC servlet-mapping in web.xml is active (not commented out), regardless of admin UI settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Roller 5.2.2 or disable the XML-RPC servlet by commenting out the servlet-mapping in web.xml.
5.2.2
- Download Apache Roller version 5.2.2 from the official Apache Roller distribution site (https://roller.apache.org/)
- Stop the currently running Apache Roller application
- Create a complete backup of the current Roller installation directory and database
- Extract and deploy Apache Roller 5.2.2 files to replace the existing installation
- Verify that the XML-RPC Servlet mapping in the new web.xml is either removed or remains commented out: <!-- <servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>XmlRpcServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/roller-services/xmlrpc</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping> -->
- Start the Roller application and verify it runs correctly
- Test that the application functions normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-17198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-17198 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data