Sterling B2b IntegratorApplication · Ibm

CVE-2018-1720

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.1, 5.2.6.3_6, 6.0.0.0, and 6.0.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 147294.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator versions 5.2.0.1 through 6.0.0.1 implement weaker-than-expected cryptographic algorithms, allowing attackers to decrypt highly sensitive information that should be protected by stronger encryption standards.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator that implements stronger cryptographic algorithms, or reconfigure the product to use stronger encryption ciphers and protocols.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sterling B2b IntegratorApplication
Affected:= 5.2.0.1= 5.2.6.3_6= 6.0.0.0= 6.0.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed IBM Sterling B2B Integrator version
    Access the product administration console or run the version command provided in the product documentation. Check the 'About' or 'System Information' section in the UI, or locate the version file in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.2.0.1, 5.2.6.3_6, 6.0.0.0, or 6.0.0.1.
  2. Locate the cryptographic configuration settings
    Access the product configuration files or security settings panel in the administration interface. Look for sections related to encryption, SSL/TLS, or cryptographic algorithm configuration.
    Affected if Weak or deprecated cryptographic algorithms (such as weak ciphers or hash functions) are configured or enabled.
  3. Inspect SSL/TLS cipher configurations
    Review the SSL/TLS configuration files or settings that define which cipher suites are permitted. Check for the presence of weak ciphers such as those with short key lengths or known vulnerabilities.
    Affected if Weak cipher suites are enabled or strong ciphers are not required for secure communications.
  4. Verify encryption settings for sensitive data storage
    Examine the configuration that governs how sensitive data (such as passwords, keys, or personal information) is encrypted at rest. Look for settings that specify the encryption algorithm used.
    Affected if The encryption algorithm specified for protecting sensitive data is considered weak by current standards.
  5. Check for default or hardcoded cryptographic keys
    Review the security configuration to determine if default cryptographic keys or weak key generation methods are in use. Look for any documented weak key configurations.
    Affected if Default keys or weak key derivation methods are detected in the configuration.

A user is affected if their installed IBM Sterling B2B Integrator version is one of the listed affected versions (5.2.0.1, 5.2.6.3_6, 6.0.0.0, or 6.0.0.1) AND weak cryptographic algorithms are enabled or configured in the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator that implements stronger cryptographic algorithms, or reconfigure the product to use stronger encryption ciphers and protocols.

Fix this in Sterling B2b Integrator Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1720 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1720 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data