CVE-2018-17539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BGP daemon (bgpd) in all IP Infusion ZebOS versions to 7.10.6 and all OcNOS versions to 1.3.3.145 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service attack via an autonomous system (AS) path containing 8 or more autonomous system number (ASN) elements.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe BGP daemon (bgpd) in IP Infusion ZebOS (through 7.10.6) and OcNOS (through 1.3.3.145) contains a vulnerability in AS path attribute handling. When a remote BGP peer sends an AS path containing 8 or more ASN elements, it triggers a denial of service condition, likely due to missing bounds checking or improper input validation in the AS path parsing routine.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.2.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.1= 14.0.0<= 1.3.3.145<= 7.10.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BGP daemon software product and versionRun 'show version' or check the system documentation to determine if the device runs IP Infusion ZebOS, OcNOS, or F5 Big-IP LTM. For F5 Big-IP, use 'tmsh show sys version' or check the GUI under System > Software Management > ISO Image.Affected if The device runs ZebOS <= 7.10.6, OcNOS <= 1.3.3.145, or F5 Big-IP LTM versions 11.2.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3, 13.0.0-13.1.1, or 14.0.0.
-
Verify BGP is configured and activeCheck the BGP configuration using 'show ip bgp summary' (ZebOS/OcNOS) or 'tmsh show ltm virtual' and review BGP neighbor status. Use 'show running-config | include router bgp' to list active BGP instances.Affected if BGP is enabled and peers are configured. The vulnerability requires BGP to be running for a crafted AS path to be processed.
-
Identify BGP peers and AS path configurationsRun 'show ip bgp neighbors' (ZebOS/OcNOS) or check the BGP peer configuration in the F5 Big-IP device management. Look for configured AS path filters or AS path length limits.Affected if BGP peers exist. The vulnerability is triggered by receiving a BGP update with an AS path containing 8 or more ASN elements from a remote peer.
-
Check for AS path length limits in BGP configurationReview BGP routing policies using 'show ip bgp policy' (ZebOS/OcNOS) or examine route maps and prefix lists in the BGP configuration. Look for 'as-path' match conditions or AS path length filters.Affected if No AS path length restrictions are configured. The advisory notes that configuring peer filters to reject AS paths exceeding a reasonable length can mitigate the issue.
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable ZebOS, OcNOS, or F5 Big-IP LTM version AND has BGP enabled with peers, allowing remote BGP peers to send AS path attributes containing 8 or more ASN elements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches for ZebOS and OcNOS. As a defensive measure, configure BGP peer filters to reject updates with AS paths exceeding a reasonable length threshold, and implement BGP route validation to limit accepted AS path lengths.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-17539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-17539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data