CdhApplication · Cloudera

CVE-2018-17860

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.14.0 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cloudera CDH has Insecure Permissions because ALL cannot be revoked.This affects 5.x through 5.15.1 and 6.x through 6.0.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cloudera CDH contains an insecure permissions vulnerability where the 'ALL' permission grant cannot be revoked, allowing users who have been granted ALL permissions to retain full access to resources even after attempts to restrict those permissions. This affects versions 5.x through 5.15.1 and 6.x through 6.0.1.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched Cloudera CDH version beyond 5.15.1 or 6.0.1, or apply Cloudera-provided patches that address the permission revocation issue.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CdhApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0, <= 5.14.0= 5.15.0= 5.15.1= 6.0.0= 6.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cloudera CDH version
    Run 'cloudera-manager --version' or check the Cloudera Manager admin console under Hosts > All Hosts to view the CDH version parcel
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0.0 through 5.14.0, or exactly 5.15.0, 5.15.1, 6.0.0, or 6.0.1
  2. Locate users granted ALL permissions
    In Cloudera Manager, navigate to Administration > Users and Groups > Users, or use the 'klist' or 'ldapsearch' commands to enumerate principals with the 'ALL' permission grant on any resource
    Affected if Any user account has been explicitly granted the ALL permission on HDFS, Hive, HBase, or other cluster resources
  3. Verify if ALL permission revocation was attempted
    Review Cloudera Manager audit logs under Diagnostics > Audits for permission change events, specifically look for 'revoke' or 'modify permission' operations targeting previously granted ALL permissions
    Affected if There are audit records showing attempted revocation of ALL permissions that may have failed or been ineffective
  4. Confirm users retain access after revocation
    As the user who had ALL permissions revoked, attempt to perform actions on resources (read, write, execute) that should have been restricted, or check current ACLs via 'hdfs dfs -getfacl' or Impala/Hive SHOW GRANT commands
    Affected if Users still have full access to resources despite permission revocation attempts
  5. Check authorization provider configuration
    In Cloudera Manager, go to Clusters > [Cluster Name] > Configuration and verify the authorization provider setting (Sentry, Ranger, or native ACLs), then review the permission policy files for ANY grants that may override revoke actions
    Affected if The authorization provider is configured and contains persistent ALL permission grants that cannot be modified

A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable CDH version (5.x-5.15.1 or 6.x-6.0.1) and has users who were granted ALL permissions that were subsequently attempted to be revoked but who still retain full access

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.14.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched Cloudera CDH version beyond 5.15.1 or 6.0.1, or apply Cloudera-provided patches that address the permission revocation issue.

Fix this in Cdh Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
40.0 hours of engineering $7,000
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-17860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-17860 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data