CVE-2018-18282
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNext.js 7.0.0 and 7.0.1 has XSS via the 404 or 500 /_error page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNext.js versions 7.0.0 and 7.0.1 contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the built-in error pages (/404 and /500 accessed via /_error). User-supplied input rendered on these error pages is not properly sanitized, allowing injection of malicious scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.0= 7.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Next.js installation and versionRun 'npm list next' or check the 'next' dependency version in your package.json fileAffected if The installed version is 7.0.0 or 7.0.1
-
Locate the Next.js package directoryFind the node_modules/next directory and run 'cat node_modules/next/package.json | grep version' to confirm the installed versionAffected if The version listed is exactly 7.0.0 or 7.0.1
-
Determine if default error pages are in useCheck if custom error pages exist at pages/_error.js, pages/404.js, or pages/500.js in your project. If these files do not exist, the built-in error pages are being used.Affected if No custom error page components exist in the pages directory, meaning the vulnerable built-in error pages are active
-
Test error page for XSS injectionAccess /_error?message=<script>alert(1)</script> or /404?status=500&message=<img+src=x+onerror=alert(1)> and inspect the rendered HTML to see if the input is reflected without sanitizationAffected if The injected script or HTML tags appear unescaped in the page source, confirming the XSS vulnerability is exploitable
You are affected if Next.js version 7.0.0 or 7.0.1 is installed and the built-in error pages (/_error, /404, /500) are being used without custom error page components.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Next.js to version 7.0.2 or later where this XSS vulnerability in the error pages has been patched.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18282 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data