LemonApplication · Mossle

CVE-2018-18315

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-10-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
com/mossle/cdn/CdnController.java in lemon 1.9.0 allows attackers to upload arbitrary files because the copyMultipartFileToFile method in CdnUtils only checks for a ../ substring, and does not validate the file type and spaceName parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The CdnController.java in lemon 1.9.0 contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability where the copyMultipartFileToFile method in CdnUtils only checks for '../' substring in the filename but fails to validate file types or the spaceName parameter, allowing attackers to upload malicious files to the server.

MitigationImplement strict allowlist-based file type validation, validate the spaceName parameter against expected values, and store uploaded files outside webroot with random filenames to prevent arbitrary file upload attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LemonApplication
Affected:= 1.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify lemon installation and version
    Locate the lemon web application deployment and check the version indicator (such as version manifest, pom.xml, or version file in the installation directory). Compare the installed version to the affected version 1.9.0.
    Affected if The installed lemon version is exactly 1.9.0.
  2. Locate the vulnerable CdnController component
    Search the deployed application for the file CdnController.java or its compiled class CdnController.class, or for CdnUtils.java/CdnUtils.class containing the copyMultipartFileToFile method.
    Affected if The CdnController or CdnUtils component with the copyMultipartFileToFile method is present in the deployment.
  3. Verify the CDN file upload endpoint is exposed
    Check if the CdnController servlet endpoint for file upload is mapped and accessible (typically at a URL path containing '/cdn/' or '/file/upload').
    Affected if The CDN upload endpoint is accessible without additional authentication or with weak authentication.
  4. Inspect the file type validation logic
    Examine the CdnUtils.copyMultipartFileToFile method code to confirm it lacks proper file type validation (no allowlist check for permitted extensions/content-types).
    Affected if The code shows no file type allowlist validation is implemented in the upload method.
  5. Check the spaceName parameter handling
    Review the CdnController code to verify whether the spaceName parameter is validated against expected values before being used in file operations.
    Affected if The spaceName parameter is used without validation against an allowlist of permitted values.

You are affected if lemon version 1.9.0 is deployed and the CdnController file upload endpoint is accessible without proper file type or spaceName validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict allowlist-based file type validation, validate the spaceName parameter against expected values, and store uploaded files outside webroot with random filenames to prevent arbitrary file upload attacks.

Fix this in Lemon Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18315 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data