CVE-2018-18565
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Roche Accu-Chek Inform II Instrument before 03.06.00 (Serial number below 14000) and 04.x before 04.03.00 (Serial Number above 14000), CoaguChek Pro II before 04.03.00, CoaguChek XS Plus before 03.01.06, CoaguChek XS Pro before 03.01.06, cobas h 232 before 03.01.03 (Serial number below KQ0400000 or KS0400000), and cobas h 232 before 04.00.04 (Serial number above KQ0400000 or KS0400000). A vulnerability in the software update mechanism allows authenticated attackers in the adjacent network to overwrite arbitrary files on the system through a crafted update package.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the software update mechanism of multiple Roche medical devices (Accu-Chek Inform II, CoaguChek Pro II, CoaguChek XS Plus, CoaguChek XS Pro, and cobas h 232). Authenticated attackers on the adjacent network can exploit this flaw by crafting malicious update packages that allow arbitrary file overwrite on the targeted system, potentially enabling code execution or system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 03.06.00>= 04.00.00, < 04.03.00< 03.01.03>= 04.00.00, < 04.00.04< 04.03.00< 03.01.06< 03.01.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Roche device modelLocate the device label or access the device's system information to confirm whether it is an Accu-Chek Inform II, CoaguChek Pro II, CoaguChek XS Plus, CoaguChek XS Pro, or cobas h 232 unitAffected if The device matches one of the affected product lines listed in the CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device's built-in system settings, maintenance menu, or diagnostic screen to view the current firmware version. Compare it against the affected version ranges: Accu-Chek Inform II < 03.06.00 or >= 04.00.00 and < 04.03.00; cobas h 232 < 03.01.03 or >= 04.00.00 and < 04.00.04; CoaguChek Pro II < 04.03.00; CoaguChek XS Plus < 03.01.06; CoaguChek XS Pro < 03.01.06Affected if The installed firmware version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges listed in the CVE
-
Verify network accessibility to the deviceDetermine whether the device is connected to a network segment that allows adjacent network attackers to reach the device's software update interfaceAffected if The device's update mechanism is reachable from an adjacent network without additional network segmentation or firewall controls
-
Check update mechanism configurationReview the device settings or documentation to determine whether the software update mechanism is configured to accept packages without requiring strong authenticationAffected if The update mechanism does not enforce authentication or uses weak credentials for update package validation
A defender is affected if their Roche device matches one of the listed models and runs firmware versions below the fixed thresholds while the software update mechanism is accessible from an adjacent network without proper authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data03.01.0303.01.0603.06.00
Apply the vendor-supplied patches by updating to the fixed software versions (Accu-Chek Inform II 03.06.00 or 04.03.00, CoaguChek Pro II 04.03.00, CoaguChek XS Plus/XS Pro 03.01.06, cobas h 232 03.01.03 or 04.00.04 depending on serial number). Additionally, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the adjacent network and enforce authentication controls for update mechanisms.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18565 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18565 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data