CVE-2018-18816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe repository component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO JasperReports Server, TIBCO JasperReports Server Community Edition, TIBCO JasperReports Server for ActiveMatrix BPM, TIBCO Jaspersoft for AWS with Multi-Tenancy, TIBCO Jaspersoft Reporting and Analytics for AWS contains a persistent cross site scripting vulnerability. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO JasperReports Server: versions up to and including 6.3.4; 6.4.0; 6.4.1; 6.4.2; 6.4.3; 7.1.0, TIBCO JasperReports Server Community Edition: versions up to and including 7.1.0, TIBCO JasperReports Server for ActiveMatrix BPM: versions up to and including 6.4.3, TIBCO Jaspersoft for AWS with Multi- Tenancy versions up to and including 7.1.0, and TIBCO Jaspersoft Reporting and Analytics for AWS: versions up to and including 7.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA persistent (stored) cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in the repository component of TIBCO JasperReports Server and related products (Community Edition, for ActiveMatrix BPM, and AWS variants). Attackers can inject malicious scripts into the repository that are stored on the server and executed when other users view or interact with the compromised content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.3.4<= 6.4.3<= 7.1.0= 6.4.0= 6.4.1= 6.4.2= 6.4.3= 7.1.0<= 7.1.0<= 7.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JasperReports Server versionLog into the web interface and navigate to the Help > About page, or check the build.properties or version files in the installation directory (typically in <install_dir>/build.xml or <install_dir>/reportserver/build.properties)Affected if The installed version is 6.3.4 or lower, 6.4.0 through 6.4.3, or 7.1.0 or lower (all <= 7.1.0)
-
Confirm repository component is enabledVerify the repository service is running and accessible by logging into the web UI and attempting to browse the repository tree (typically under the 'View' > 'Repository' menu or the 'Repository' sidebar panel)Affected if The repository component is accessible to users without administrator privileges, allowing file and content uploads
-
Inspect repository content for suspicious scriptsUsing the web UI, navigate through repository folders and inspect any stored reports, images, or content files. Alternatively, query the database tables (typically JIReportJob or similar repository tables) for HTML script tags, javascript: URIs, or event handler attributesAffected if Any repository content contains unencoded <script>, <img src=javascript:>, onload=, onerror=, or similar XSS vectors
-
Review web access logs for XSS attack patternsExamine the application server access logs (typically in <install_dir>/apache-tomcat/logs or similar) for repeated requests containing script tags or event handlers in repository-related URLsAffected if Logs show incoming requests with malicious script payloads being stored in repository fields
You are affected if your JasperReports Server or Jaspersoft installation is version 7.1.0 or lower and the repository component is exposed to users without server-side input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches to upgrade to a fixed version beyond 7.1.0, or implement server-side input validation and output encoding on the repository component to neutralize malicious script payloads.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data