Laquis ScadaApplication · Lcds

CVE-2018-18992

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-02-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.1.0.4150 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
LCDS Laquis SCADA prior to version 4.1.0.4150 allows taking in user input without proper sanitation, which may allow an attacker to execute remote code on the server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

LCDS Laquis SCADA prior to version 4.1.0.4150 contains an input validation vulnerability where user-supplied data is processed without proper sanitization, potentially allowing remote code execution on the server through injection of malicious commands.

MitigationUpgrade Laquis SCADA to version 4.1.0.4150 or later. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation and sanitization at all entry points and restrict network access to the SCADA interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Laquis ScadaApplication
Affected:< 4.1.0.4150

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the installed Laquis SCADA version
    Check the Laquis SCADA installation directory for version information files, or access the About/Version section within the SCADA application interface. Common locations include the main executable properties, an About dialog, or a version.txt file in the installation folder.
    Affected if The displayed version number is lower than 4.1.0.4150, indicating the installation is prior to the patched release.
  2. Verify the SCADA server is running
    Check if the Laquis SCADA server service or process is active. This may be visible in Windows Task Manager, Services panel, or by checking if the SCADA listening ports (commonly TCP ports associated with Laquis) are in an open state using netstat or a port scanner.
    Affected if The server is running and accepting remote connections, creating a potential attack surface for the input validation flaw.
  3. Inspect network exposure of the SCADA interface
    Review firewall rules, router configurations, or network ACLs to determine if the Laquis SCADA web or server interface is accessible from untrusted networks. Use netstat -an or similar tools to identify listening IPs and ports.
    Affected if The SCADA interface is bound to 0.0.0.0 or an external IP address rather than localhost or a trusted internal network, increasing exposure to remote exploitation.
  4. Review input handling configuration
    Examine the SCADA project configuration files or server settings for any exposed input entry points such as web interfaces, API endpoints, or data import features that accept user-supplied data without apparent validation.
    Affected if The SCADA system exposes input channels (web forms, data import, remote commands) that process user data without documented sanitization, indicating the vulnerable configuration may be present.

If the installed Laquis SCADA version is lower than 4.1.0.4150 AND the SCADA server interface is network-accessible, the environment is likely affected by this input validation vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.1.0.4150 or later
Fixed in 4.1.0.4150
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Laquis SCADA to version 4.1.0.4150 or later. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation and sanitization at all entry points and restrict network access to the SCADA interface.

Fix this in Laquis Scada Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18992 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data