Emptoris Contract ManagementApplication · Ibm

CVE-2018-1961

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.1.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Emptoris Contract Management 10.0.0 and 10.1.3.0 could disclose sensitive information from detailed information from error messages. IBM X-Force ID: 153657.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Emptoris Contract Management versions 10.0.0 and 10.1.3.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where detailed error messages expose sensitive system information to users. This could include stack traces, file paths, database details, or configuration data that should not be visible in production environments.

MitigationConfigure the application to display generic error messages to end users rather than detailed exception information. Disable verbose error reporting and implement custom error pages that log detailed errors server-side without exposing them to clients.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Emptoris Contract ManagementApplication
Affected:>= 10.0.0, <= 10.1.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed version
    Locate the IBM Emptoris Contract Management version file or check the application header/footer for the version number. Common locations include: installation directory\version.txt, or log into the application and check Help > About
    Affected if version is 10.0.0 through 10.1.3.0 inclusive
  2. Test for verbose error exposure
    Trigger an error condition in the application such as submitting invalid input, accessing a non-existent resource, or causing an application failure. Observe the HTTP response or error page displayed
    Affected if error messages contain stack traces, file paths, database connection strings, or internal system details
  3. Check custom error page configuration
    Inspect the web.xml deployment descriptor file (typically in WEB-INF/web.xml) for <error-page> mappings. Verify if custom error pages are configured to handle exceptions and HTTP errors generically
    Affected if no custom error pages are defined, or error pages still display exception details rather than generic messages
  4. Review error reporting configuration
    Check application configuration files (such as log4j.properties, log4j.xml, or similar logging config) for errorReportValve settings or verbose error logging levels. Also check if the application server (WebSphere, Tomcat, etc.) is configured to show detailed errors
    Affected if error reporting is set to show verbose details to users, or debug mode is enabled in production
  5. Inspect HTTP response headers
    Make a request to the application and examine the HTTP response headers and body for server information leakage. Use browser developer tools or a tool like curl to capture full responses including error responses
    Affected if responses expose Java exception class names, stack traces, or full file paths in headers or body

If the installed version falls within 10.0.0 to 10.1.3.0 AND the application displays detailed error information (stack traces, file paths, or system details) to end users, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.1.3.0
Interim mitigation

Configure the application to display generic error messages to end users rather than detailed exception information. Disable verbose error reporting and implement custom error pages that log detailed errors server-side without exposing them to clients.

Fix this in Emptoris Contract Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1961 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data