CVE-2018-1999025
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA man in the middle vulnerability exists in Jenkins TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin 2.3 and earlier in ATXPublisher.java, ATXValidator.java that allows attackers to impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Jenkins TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin versions 2.3 and earlier allows attackers to intercept and impersonate any service that Jenkins connects to. The vulnerability exists in ATXPublisher.java and ATXValidator.java, likely due to improper or missing SSL/TLS certificate validation when establishing connections to downstream services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify TraceTronic ECU-TEST plugin is installedIn Jenkins, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or run: jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins (or check $JENKINS_HOME/plugins directory)Affected if The TraceTronic ECU-TEST plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn the Installed plugins tab, find the TraceTronic ECU-TEST plugin and note the version number shown in the Version columnAffected if The version is 2.3 or earlier (e.g., 2.3, 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.x)
-
Identify jobs using the pluginSearch job configurations for 'tracetronic', 'ECUTest', 'ATXPublisher', or 'ATXValidator' references, or review any jobs configured to use TraceTronic ECU-TEST integrationAffected if Any Jenkins job or pipeline is configured to use TraceTronic ECU-TEST plugin functionality
You are affected if the TraceTronic ECU-TEST plugin version is 2.3 or earlier AND at least one Jenkins job uses this plugin to connect to downstream services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of the TraceTronic ECU-TEST Plugin (version 2.4 or later), or if no patch is available, ensure Jenkins only connects to trusted networks to mitigate MITM risk.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1999025 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1999025 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data