CVE-2018-1999031
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins meliora-testlab Plugin 1.14 and earlier in TestlabNotifier.java that allows attackers with file system access to the Jenkins master to obtain the API key stored in this plugin's configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe meliora-testlab Jenkins plugin versions 1.14 and earlier stores the Testlab API key in plaintext within its configuration file (TestlabNotifier.java). An attacker with file system access to the Jenkins master can read this configuration file and obtain the API key, potentially allowing unauthorized access to the Testlab service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if meliora-testlab plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or inspect the plugins directory on the Jenkins master file system for a meliora-testlab folderAffected if The plugin folder exists in the Jenkins plugins directory
-
Determine the installed plugin versionCheck the plugin's manifest file (typically MANIFEST.MF or the .jpi file's metadata) for the version number, or view the version in the Jenkins plugin manager UIAffected if The version is 1.14 or lower
-
Locate the Testlab notifier configurationSearch in the Jenkins home directory for files containing 'testlab' or 'TestlabNotifier' in the name, typically found under $JENKINS_HOME/org.jenkinsci.plugins meliora-testlab/ or within the main Jenkins configuration XML filesAffected if A Testlab notifier configuration file exists
-
Inspect configuration for plaintext API keyOpen the Testlab configuration file and search for any field labeled 'apiKey', 'api.token', or similar credential field. Check if the value appears as a raw alphanumeric string rather than a Jenkins credential ID reference (such as $CREDENTIALS_ID)Affected if The API key or token appears as a visible plaintext string value in the configuration
The environment is affected if the meliora-testlab plugin version is 1.14 or lower and a Testlab notifier configuration contains a plaintext API key rather than a credential ID reference.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade meliora-testlab plugin to a version newer than 1.14 (which should implement secure credential storage), and rotate any API keys that may have been exposed.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1999031 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1999031 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data