Securedoc Disk EncryptionApplication · Winmagic

CVE-2018-20341

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.3 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WINMAGIC SecureDoc Disk Encryption software before 8.3 has an Unquoted Service Path vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on a target system. If the executable is enclosed in quote tags "" then the system will know where to find it. However if the path of where the application binary is located doesn't contain any quotes then Windows will try to find it and execute it inside every folder of this path until they reach the executable.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WINMAGIC SecureDoc Disk Encryption service before version 8.3 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability. The service runs with elevated privileges (typical for disk encryption) and its executable path contains spaces without quotes, causing Windows to attempt executing binaries from intermediate directories before reaching the intended executable. This enables privilege escalation to SYSTEM level.

MitigationUpdate SecureDoc to version 8.3 or later to receive the vendor patch, or modify the service configuration to use properly quoted executable paths if patching is not feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Securedoc Disk EncryptionApplication
Affected:< 8.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if SecureDoc service exists
    Run 'sc query SecureDoc' or 'Get-Service -Name SecureDoc' in PowerShell/Command Prompt
    Affected if The service is not found, meaning the product is not installed
  2. Retrieve the service executable path
    Run 'sc qc SecureDoc' and examine the BINARY_PATH_NAME field, or use 'Get-WmiObject win32_service | Where-Object {$_.Name -eq "SecureDoc"} | Select-Object -ExpandProperty PathName'
    Affected if The path contains spaces and is not enclosed in quotes (e.g., C:\Program Files\WinMagic\SecureDoc\sdcserv.exe instead of "C:\Program Files\WinMagic\SecureDoc\sdcserv.exe")
  3. Check the service startup type and privileges
    Run 'sc qc SecureDoc' and examine the START_TYPE and SERVICE_START_NAME fields, or use 'Get-WmiObject win32_service | Where-Object {$_.Name -eq "SecureDoc"} | Select-Object StartName, StartMode'
    Affected if The service is set to start automatically (AUTO_START) and runs as LocalSystem or a privileged account
  4. Verify the installed SecureDoc version
    Locate the SecureDoc executable (commonly in C:\Program Files\WinMagic\SecureDoc\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\WinMagic\SecureDoc\) and run 'Get-ItemProperty -Path "<path to sdcserv.exe>" | Select-Object VersionInfo' or right-click the file and view Properties
    Affected if The version displayed is earlier than 8.3 (e.g., 8.2, 8.1, 8.0, etc.) or cannot be determined as 8.3 or later

Your environment is affected if the SecureDoc service is installed, runs with elevated privileges, has an unquoted executable path containing spaces, and the installed version is below 8.3.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.3 or later
Fixed in 8.3
Interim mitigation

Update SecureDoc to version 8.3 or later to receive the vendor patch, or modify the service configuration to use properly quoted executable paths if patching is not feasible.

Fix this in Securedoc Disk Encryption Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,220
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,552.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-20341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-20341 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data