Connect SecureApplication · Ivanti

CVE-2018-20810

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-06-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Session data between cluster nodes during cluster synchronization is not properly encrypted in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX, PPS 5.2RX, or stand-alone devices.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Pulse Connect Secure 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.4RX before 5.4R2, session data transmitted between cluster nodes during cluster synchronization is transmitted without proper encryption, allowing potential interception or exposure of sensitive session information.

MitigationUpgrade to PCS 8.3R2 or PPS 5.4R2 (or later) to remediate this vulnerability. Stand-alone deployments are not affected.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Connect SecureApplication
Affected:= 8.3
Pulse Policy SecureApplication
Affected:= 5.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product
    Log into the admin console or check system documentation to confirm whether the system is running Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) or Pulse Policy Secure (PPS)
    Affected if The product is Ivanti Connect Secure or Pulsesecure Pulse Policy Secure
  2. Check the installed version
    View the system version information in the admin console under System > Status or use the CLI command to display the firmware version
    Affected if The version is 8.3.x before 8.3R2 for Connect Secure, or 5.4.x before 5.4R2 for Policy Secure
  3. Determine if clustering is enabled
    Check the cluster configuration in the admin console under System > Cluster Status or examine the network configuration to verify if the device is part of a cluster setup
    Affected if Clustering is enabled and the device is synchronized with other nodes in the cluster
  4. Verify cluster synchronization is in use
    Review the cluster synchronization settings to confirm that session data synchronization between nodes is active
    Affected if Session synchronization between cluster nodes is configured and operational

The environment is affected only if running a vulnerable version (8.3 through 8.3R1 for PCS, or 5.4 through 5.4R1 for PPS) AND clustering is enabled with active node synchronization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to PCS 8.3R2 or PPS 5.4R2 (or later) to remediate this vulnerability. Stand-alone deployments are not affected.

Recommended fix High confidence

PCS 8.3R2 or later; PPS 5.4R2 or later

  1. Identify whether you are running Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) or Pulse Policy Secure (PPS)
  2. Determine the current installed version using the admin console or command line
  3. Backup the current device configuration before making changes
  4. For PCS 8.3RX: upgrade to Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R2 or later
  5. For PPS 5.4RX: upgrade to Pulse Policy Secure 5.4R2 or later
  6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and cluster synchronization is functioning properly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Connect Secure Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-20810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-20810 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data